Follow me:

    When The Plate Breaks…

    If you don’t know this about me, I have an unfortunate proclivity for breaking things.

    However!

    The more unfortunate thing is those things usually do not belong to me.

    It’s a problem.

    Whenever I go to someone’s house for the first time, my elbows may as well be sewn to my sides, and in the glassware aisle of department stores?

    I’ll have you know I do a very convincing impression of a totem pole.

    For young Sarah, the pithy “If you break it, you buy it!” wasn’t just a threat.

    It was a promise.

    One that is unfortunately still relevant.

    I now offer a list of the most notable things I’ve broken:

    A chandelier fifteen feet in the air.

    The lid of an ornate glass lemonade dispenser.

    An entirely innocent and adorable elephant mug.

    And most recently, a dinner plate.

    All felled by yours truly.

    Why am I talking about this?

    Well, I figure with everyone crammed in together, things are going to start breaking sooner or later, so the lessons I’ve learned from being a *eh-hem* home wrecker are likely more relevant than ever!

    See, in my 20+ year career of breaking things left, right, and center, I’ve discovered that the aftermath of shattering whatever it may be is a prime time to sit up and take notice of the people in your vicinity.

    Because here’s the thing:

    There’s nothing like the unexpected sound of breaking glass to make people react before fully thinking about it.

    And their unfiltered response can tell you a lot.

    Maya Angelou famously said,

    “When people show you who they are, believe them.”

    I agree.

    And let me tell you, breaking things is a solid way to suss out the inner being of the people who witness the shattering.

    So!

    With that being said, I want to examine the things that can be gleaned from the three typical responses I’ve garnered on the back end of breaking things.

    Response 1: Anger

    For some people, the sound of shattering glass necessitates screaming.

    Don’t ask me why.

    I have no idea.

    You’d think that I’d gone all Martina, The Beautiful Cockroach on them, and intentionally smashed their favorite teapot.

    Pretty much never the case, but c’est la vie.

    Frankly, I’m grateful for their honest reaction because it tells me that they value that teapot (or x, y, and z thing) more than they value treating me with dignity.

    Riffing off Queen Angelou,

    “When people show you who you are to them, believe them.”

    And if you rank lower than a teapot, it’s a very good sign it’s time to get the heck out of dodge.

    Pronto.

    Seriously.

    It’s okay for someone to be upset if you break something.

    Maybe they had a bad day.

    Or that item was really important to them.

    But if it was clearly an accident and they completely fly off the handle?

    Response 2: Indifference

    If you’re like me, the word “indifference” does not inspire warm and fuzzy feelings.

    HOWEVER!

    Let me set the scene:

    I had just accidentally broken the entire handle off my roommate’s adorable elephant mug, and I was in full panic mode.

    She grew up in Africa, so in my mind, the elephant mug must’ve been of high, high importance.

    A childhood momento.

    A cherished beverage vessel from which to sip and reminisce.

    And I had just broken it.

    I couldn’t find a gif, but if you’ve seen The Princess Diaries, this was me:

    I may or may not have willed my saliva to resinousness in a desperate bid to get the handle to reattach.

    I achieved little (read: no) success.

    My second thought was to simply pretend that the mug had never had a handle at all.

    Surely she wouldn’t notice.

    I would just play it cool and not say anything until such an opportunity presented itself to lean into my Asian ancestry and compliment her on her graduation from a handled mug to the far superior Chinese-buffet style way of hot beverage consumption.

    Tuxton ALF-0455 DuraTux 4 1/2 oz 3" Diameter Porcelain White ...

    That was my plan anyways.

    And I’m not saying it wouldn’t have worked!

    However, she happened to come into the room just then, catching me with her mug and its handle in hand.

    She looked at me.

    I looked at her.

    …all six feet of her.

    “I am so sorry,” I blurted. “Please don’t be mad–I’ll buy you a new one! I promise!”

    She shrugged and laughed.

    “Sarah, it’s just things.”

    And then she put her backpack down and went about her business.

    I was aghast, and I full on just stood there staring at her for probably thirty seconds.

    I’d been ready to be screamed at, but she was completely indifferent to the destruction of Mr. Elephant.

    “It’s just things,” she’d said.

    Honestly, that memory gives me the warm fuzzies because in just one sentence she taught me such a valuable lesson.

    Broken things are just that: things.

    Their breakers are human beings.

    We should treat each accordingly.

    Response 3: “Are You Okay?”

    This, at least for me, has been the most infrequent response, but it’s also the one that I like best!

    I know… I know.

    Nemo judex in causa sua.

    However!

    Even if I didn’t break things left, right, and center, I would still say that this is the paragon response because it goes above and beyond in approaching the person who feels embarrassed and/or upset about having yet again broken something that didn’t belong to them.

    I’ve experienced this twice.

    The first time was when I shattered the top of my aunt’s glass lemonade dispenser after a family get-together. She swooped in and got me away from the broken glass ASAP before making my uncle clean it.

    She wasn’t even mad.

    She just wanted me to be okay.

    The same thing happened just last week when I dropped a dinner plate, and my mom came, broom in hand, to rescue bare-footed me.

    I recognize that both of these instances feature family, but I don’t think it must or should be this way.

    In fact, a goal I have for myself is to make sure that I follow the example they gave me when I’m going about life generally.

    Do I run towards a mess or run away?

    Do I help or berate?

    Am I checking if the person is okay?

    All good questions.

    And they don’t only apply to broken plates 🙂

    “What Makes You Beautiful?” ft. One Direction

    Friends, I don’t know about you, but almost a month into quarantine, I am… *eh-hem* not looking my best.

    I got a look at myself via Zoom the other day and had to do a double take.

    It me.

    Just goes to show that vitamin-D deficiency, sporadic showering, and having no one to impress will do absolutely nothing for your appearance.

    Who knew 🙂

    However, as I was wondering just when it was that I started resembling the Hunchback of Notre Dame, I got to thinking about attractiveness more generally, and given that I will likely be in Quasimodo-mode for the foreseeable future, I thought now was as good a time as any to talk about beauty.

    And because I’m feeling nostalgic for the days when it wasn’t potentially a death sentence to go out and buy groceries, I figured we’d kick things back to 2011 and see what the preeminent boy band of my middle school days had to say to the question:

    What Makes You Beautiful?

    As was the case with my musical musings on Kygo’s “Higher Love,” I find myself sadly at odds with One Direction, and I fear I must go in… another direction 🙂

    Because despite how sad middle-school Sarah would be to hear it, upon closer examination and further reflection, college-Sarah disagrees with both the spirit and the lyrics of the song.

    So…

    Where did One Direction go wrong?

    Focusing On The Physical

    While the generous hearer of “What Makes You Beautiful” might see it as an encouragement to the insecure, adolescent girl, I’m a bit more skeptical.

    Because while One-D’s espoused prerequisites for beauty are seemingly universally accessible:

    Eschewing make-up.

    Flipping your hair.

    Smiling at the ground.

    They are also all physical.

    Which means that according to One Direction, beauty is stuck in the superficial.

    Now, I think we all know by now that that’s nonsense.

    For one thing, we’re all on an inevitable march towards external ugliness.

    You might look amazing now, but one day, those things are gonna fall.

    Gravity gets us all.

    Does that preclude someone from being beautiful?

    I don’t think so.

    My Grandma was one of the most beautiful people in the world.

    Both when she looked like this:

    And when she looked like this:

    Her appearance might’ve been different, but her beauty was consistent.

    Because the truly admirable and worthwhile kind of beauty resides on the inside, and while bodies degrade and decay, your heart--your soul–can always grow more beautiful.

    Which brings me to my next point of diversion from One Direction.

    True Beauty Is Not Effortless

    Implicit in the general ethos of “What Makes You Beautiful” is the oft repeated platitude:

    “You’re beautiful just the way you are.”

    Take the final line of the first verse:

    You're insecure/
    Don't know what for/
    You're turning heads when you walk through the door/
    Don't need make-up/
    To cover up/
    Being the way that you are is enough

    How nice.

    Truly, it’s a well-intentioned sentiment, and I don’t fault them for it.

    However…

    Given that the most enduring, admirable sort of beauty has nothing to do with what you looked like when you woke up this morning and everything to do with with how you comported yourself every second since gaining consciousness, it simply cannot be the case that just being is enough to be truly beautiful.

    I’m reading Friedrich Schiller’s On the Aesthetic Education of Man right now, and in his “Fifth Letter” he says this:

    “Man portrays himself by his deeds, and what kind of image is shaped in the drama of the present!”

    I completely agree.

    Beauty, true beauty, is the work of decisions made and actions undertaken in the drama of the present.

    It isn’t effortless.

    We know this.

    The heroes of our history books did hard things, admirable things, beautiful things, and they often did them when the going got tough and at tremendous personal cost, suffering truly significant, even mortal, loss.

    So when the chips are down, who are you really?

    Who are you choosing to be?

    A dragon lady?

    A scoundrel?

    A brat?

    Or are you taking the opportunity to be and become beautiful?

    Only you can answer that.

    This brings me to my final point!

    You Should Know Whether Or Not You’re Beautiful

    The all important chorus of One Direction’s flagship song concludes with this:

    You don't know, oh oh/
    You don't know you're beautiful, oh oh/
    That's what makes you beautiful!

    Yeah, no.

    Even superficially, lacking self-awareness is not a particularly attractive trait.

    However, when it comes to interior beauty, if you don’t know whether or not you’re beautiful or whether or not you’re at least on your way to becoming beautiful, I guarantee you are not.

    100% guarantee it.

    Because if beauty is a process and product of hard, grueling, and maybe even costly work, and you don’t know whether or not you’ve taken part…

    You haven’t.

    Let me put it this way:

    Doctors remember their time in residency.

    Lawyers remember their 1L year.

    PhDs remember their dissertations.

    And on and on and on…

    Because those titles were hard won.

    And in that respect, being a truly beautiful person is no different.

    The process is certainly a memorable one.

    However…

    Here’s the daunting and wonderful thing that I’ve come to see:

    Life, all of life, is the training and the testing ground for beauty.

    Every day brings with it new opportunities to become the kind of person you never thought you could be.

    I mean, that’s certainly true for me.

    And listen, I struggled with vanity for a very long time, (still do, sometimes!) so I get wanting to be pretty and all that rot.

    But honestly, I’ve come to see that what I want more than anything is to be able to say definitively that the most beautiful part of me is the heart, the soul, the character, I am cultivating.

    So…

    Sorry, One Direction, but I’m afraid the path to beauty lies in…

    Another direction.

    *I know this post has nothing to do with Easter Sunday, but all the same! I hope you had a blessed day because about 2000 years ago, Jesus broke out of that grave 🙂

    The Tone Trap

    “It’s not what you say—it’s how you say it.”

    We’ve all been there.

    You’re having a reasonable discussion, disagreement emerges, and suddenly the verbal equivalent of a knock-down-drag-out is raging in the living room, car, or a place that’s a just little too public… like Whole Foods.

    But, hey!

    The gloves are off, the salad bar is overpriced anyways, and you are ready to throw down!

    How did this happen?

    I’m going to bet it has something to do with the dreaded t-word.

    Tone

    It’s a loaded term, I know, but in the grand communicative scheme, imagine tone as simply the method of delivery.

    Now, don’t go thinking that means it’s unimportant!

    Au contraire, my friend!

    Consider the difference between being handed a beautifully wrapped present and having said present chucked full-speed at your head.

    Clearly, regardless of the contents of the package, method of delivery matters.

    In fact, I would argue that tone is just as important as content when it comes to being an effective and pleasant communicator, especially when conflict arises.

    Unfortunately, tone is also the first thing to go when tempers flare.

    I noticed this pattern a while back but only started to consider why this might be the case more recently.

    Having now not only seriously thought about my theory but also verified it with the help of a few unsuspecting test subjects, I’ve come to the conclusion that tone is a trap.

    Hear me out.

    As someone who has fallen into the tone trap many a time, I feel like something of an authority on the topic, and I hope that in sharing what I’ve learned as a recurrent trappee, someone else might learn this lesson faster than me.

    But before we get there, some key players need a fuller introduction.

    The Trapper & The Trappee

    I’ve found that in the vast majority of relationships, there is at least one habitual tone abuser. This person is regularly passive-aggressive or just plain aggressive-aggressive when handling conflict or even when going about life in general.

    In the most dire circumstances, just the sound of their voice is enough to raise hackles.

    Oftentimes, the people in their life might wonder whether they understand how they come across.

    “Do they know they sound like that?” is the ever present question.

    This is person zero: the trapper.

    On the other hand, you have the trappee.

    The trappee is basically Bambi.

    More submissive.

    Conflict averse.

    Prey.

    Whose go-to response to disagreement is usually to yield or run away.

    But not always.

    Because even Bambi has his limits.

    And I submit that tone is on the shortlist.

    But let me try and prove it.

    The Trap

    There are a lot of ways to yank somebody’s chain, but I think tone is one of the most diabolical ways because with mere inflection, maybe a slight change of facial expression, the most blase statement can convey that you think your interlocutor is an imbecilic piece of pond scum that would be better served with a baked potato for a brain.

    Utterly diabolical.

    Why?

    Because propriety would hold that the trappee (i.e. Bambi) turned Protozoic Mr./Mrs. Potato Head would respond to what’s actually been said–not unsaid.

    And yet…

    I challenge you to find any self-respecting human being, Bambi-esque or otherwise, who will take being implicitly informed that they have the mental acuity of spud-shaped sea-goo lying down.

    It’s incredibly hard to do!

    Maybe even harder than if they’d just outright insulted you.

    So instead of rolling over yet again, the trappee reacts to what’s been unsaid by matching the trapper word and tone for tone alone.

    And when the trappee reacts, the trapper attacks.

    …and that was the plan all along.

    Because who do you think wins that argument?

    The trapper.

    Every.

    Single.

    Time.

    Because as any fellow trappee will tell you, we are woefully unprepared for the ensuing kerfuffle.

    After all, we are bringing hooves and horns to a gun fight, and it’s just not going to go well for us.

    So what to do?

    Three things:

    #1 Strategic Retreat

    Sometimes you just need to walk away.

    Now be prepared.

    Trappers tend to moonlight as trackers, so there is a very real chance they might try to chase you down.

    Do not run.

    That only excites them.

    Instead, politely excuse yourself (i.e. do not slam doors, stomp, etc.) and do your best to put some space between the two of you…

    Even if that means locking yourself in the bathroom.

    Not indefinitely, though.

    Notice I said strategic retreat.

    Do not–I REPEAT–do not just “let it go” or shrug it off.

    We do not encourage enabling bad behavior on Cultiv8ing Character.

    You are going to reengage, but first you need to get your head, heart, and mouth in the right place.

    Because when the tone trap was sprung, there is a very good chance your brain disengaged in pure, unadulterated rage, and a disengaged, enraged brain is not going to be much use if you’re hoping to effectively or pleasantly communicate.

    So!

    Strategically retreat, collect yourself, and reengage.

    But what should this reengagement look like?

    #2 Kill ‘Em With Kindness

    It’s a cliche, I know.

    But cliches are cliche for a reason, and I’ve found that this method of handling trappers works almost every time.

    Why?

    Well, put simply, it works because instead of falling into the trap of reacting and snapping back, giving them the go ahead to attack, you’ve essentially outmaneuvered and countered them, committing to being kind and compassionate in the face of their continued buttheadedness.

    They cannot–CANNOT–handle it.

    It drives them absolutly batty because you aren’t falling for the trap.

    You are giving them no reason to ramp up and attack, and as a result, they look ridiculous.

    No one enjoys being made to look foolish.

    And yet, that’s exactly how they look.

    Now, be careful to be kind not saccharine.

    You being cloyingly, mockingly sweet or holier-than-thou will not help here because you’ll only justify their anger and, as a result, their attack.

    Putting you right back in the tone trap, and we don’t want that!

    So, remember, it is your job to be kind.

    It is their conscience’s job to make them feel like an idiot.

    “But they don’t have one!” you say.

    If that’s the case, I have to wonder if you actually want that person in your life.

    But more than likely, they do have a conscience.

    It just might need a little TLC and accountability.

    I present step/option number three.

    #3 Trap The Trapper

    By and large, I think this one should be a last resort because it brings other people in to the disagreement, but sometimes, you’ve just got to phone a friend.

    If strategic retreat and killing ’em with kindness aren’t working, get thee a mediator (i.e. the person who will trap the trapper).

    But here’s the key.

    They can’t be someone who is just going to defend you or take your side, no matter how buttheaded the other person is being.

    You must, I repeat MUST, find a mediator who values the relationship you have with the trapper.

    I’ll say that again.

    Your mediator must value the relationship you have with the trapper.

    Some Examples:

    • If you and your friend are fighting, you need a mediator who values your friendship.
    • If you and your spouse are fighting, you need one who values your marriage.
    • If you and your mother, brother, daughter, aunt, grandparent, etc. are fighting, you need one who values your family.

    Ultimately, you don’t want someone who’s “on your side” or even necessarily thinks you’re right.

    If you do that, you might win the battle, but I guarantee that eventually, you’ll lose the war.

    Bottom line being, if you’re going to trap the trapper, you need to find a mediator who wants to bring reconciliation to the relationship.

    That is, of course, if you want to keep it.

    But that’s a topic for another time, so I’ll leave the discussion of the tone trap here.

    Please pretty please subscribe and share! 🙂

    A Nail That Sticks Out…

    Almost exactly a year ago, I learned a very valuable lesson, and that is this:

    A nail that sticks out gets hit.

    How did I learn this?

    Well, by writing an Op-ed piece for the school newspaper in the wake of the “Varsity Blues” College Admissions Scandal titled: “Stop Relishing College Scandal.”

    It went down like the Titanic.

    Only faster.

    And for the first time in my life, I was the recipient of a veritable deluge of internet hate for arguing that we shouldn’t be bullying or delighting in our fellow students’ fall from grace.

    Presently, I can appreciate the irony.

    But at the time, it took me completely by surprise, and I went from being genuinely proud of what I’d written to sobbing in the bathroom of my internship.

    No lie.

    Why?

    Well, I thought I’d made things worse.

    That the words I’d meant for blessing had actually been taken as a curse.

    It also did not help that people I counted as friends and friendly acquaintances were calling me an idiot and worse online for all to see.

    However!

    In the midst of this, I received a Facebook message from a total stranger that made the entire kurfuffle more than worth it.

    I read the message again and again because while I’d already been consoled and encouraged by my family and friends, this was different.

    This was affirmation that wasn’t born of any kind of personal affection or obligation, and all I could think was,

    They got it.

    They understand.

    And friends, even if just for that one person, I’d do it all over again.

    However!

    Even though I wouldn’t change what I said or did, I still learned a lot from that incident.

    The biggest thing being, if you’re going to be a nail that sticks out, you need to be able to positively answer two questions.

    Ideally, before you go and get yourself hit 🙂

    #1 Are You Sticking Out For The Right Reasons?

    This was a big one for me because previously, I’d been sticking out for all the wrong reasons.

    See, from mid-2017 to early-2019, I’d been neck deep in political partisanship, writing op-ed pieces that not only poked the bear but full on yanked on his nose hairs.

    I’d been looking for a fight, and if you want a peek into my state of mind at the time, I wrote more about in “Toilet Paper Advice.”

    However, thanks to a series of incidents, in January 2019, the veil was lifted from my eyes, and I could finally see what a utter butt I was being.

    I quit those op-eds and pretty much politics cold-turkey.

    It was radio silence from me.

    However, when “Varsity Blues” came along and my fellow Hoyas started full-on cyber and just plain bullying the implicated students, something in me just couldn’t sit there in silence.

    Not only because I thought it was wrong but also because a month prior, I would’ve been right there with them, baying for blood and smearing those students to Kingdom Come.

    But that wasn’t me anymore.

    That wasn’t who I wanted to be anymore.

    And I wanted to implore my peers and the greater Georgetown community to try for something more.

    Something greater than mockery or acerbity or epicaricacy.

    Because that had been me.

    And I’d tasted and seen that joy, fulfillment, and peace do not follow those things, however fleetingly satisfying they might be.

    I wanted other people not to do what I had done.

    Not to be what I had been.

    A cold and callous person who delighted in the downfall of others, however earned it may have been.

    All this to say, I did and still do believe that using and sharing my shortcomings to encourage people to go a different way is a worthwhile endeavor.

    Spoiler Alert: That’s pretty much the entire point of Cultiv8ing Character!

    So… was I sticking out for the right reasons?

    I’d like to think so.

    #2 Are You Willing To Take The Hit?

    This is a more pragmatic question, but I do think it’s a worthwhile one to consider given that we are currently living under the regime of pretty voracious “cancel culture.”

    While we in the West have (thankfully!) not yet reached a point where conventional martyrdom is required, the political, social, academic, financial, and/or interpersonal cost of sticking out (especially for certain things) has, ostensibly, never been higher.

    Especially since the internet is forever.

    Dun-dun-duh.

    Seriously, though.

    If you’re going to be a nail that sticks out, are you willing to take the hit?

    Because if someone had told me,

    “Hey, Sarah. If you write this, you’re going to get hundreds of comments and messages as well as other forms of media mocking and defaming you,”

    I might’ve waffled a bit.

    However, I think my affirmative answer to question #1 would’ve ultimately impelled me go through with it.

    Because while I might’ve been writing under the banner of an opinion piece, I was actually writing a conviction piece.

    An opinion is something you hold.

    A conviction is something that holds you.

    I could’ve no more stayed silent in that situation than I could’ve walked through a concrete wall.

    Come what may.

    So let me put it this way…

    If you’re going to get hit, I’d encourage you to ask yourself whether you’re offering an opinion or operating from a conviction.

    I’d be wary of taking hits for opinions because those can change at the drop of a hat, but a conviction?

    I think you’d better be willing to take a hit for that.

    So!

    To rehash!

    If you’re going to be a nail that sticks out, make sure you…

    1. Are Sticking Out For The Right Reasons AND
    2. Are Willing To Take The Hit

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to be told when I publish new content, please subscribe! All it costs is your email address, and I promise not to spam you 🙂

    A One-Two Punch. Lights Out.

    In September of 2019, I held a seven inch kitchen knife in my hands and thought about running it through my stomach. I can’t give you a date. The days were all blurring together back then. All I know is that I wanted life, as I was experiencing it then, to end.

    For months, I would say I’d been passively suicidal. Not in the, “I’d like to slit my wrists” way, but more like “I don’t really care if a car hits me.”

    But come August, I found my feet straying more and more towards traffic, and by September, cutting vegetables had become a very real hazard.

    Why?

    Well, simply put, I was sick and tired of being sick and tired, and after over two years of decaying health with no reprieve, no diagnosis, and the only thing to show for it being thousands of dollars in medical bills, I was just…

    Done.

    I had lost both the will and the desire to keep the lights on.

    I got up every morning distraught, wishing that I’d just died in the night, and as the days ticked by, I’ll be honest…

    I got pissed.

    It felt like God and I were playing a game of chicken, and I didn’t want to play anymore.

    So I was going to call His bluff.

    I’d had enough.

    So holding the knife in my hand, I said,

    “Alright, God. It’s either going to be You or me.”

    But as I pressed the tip below my ribs, I couldn’t help but think to myself,

    “I don’t want to die. I don’t want to commit suicide. I just want to feel well again.”

    But healing seemed further from me than Heaven, and all I could see when I looked at myself was a worthless and wasted life.

    A burden.

    To my eyes, everyone would be better off if I was dead.

    Still, for some reason, the knife fell out of my hand.

    You coward, I thought.

    Pick it up again.

    But for some reason, I just couldn’t do it.

    Instead, I pressed my forehead to the floor and just cried.

    “God, I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired.”

    “Why won’t you heal me?”

    “Why won’t you save me from this?”

    And like a wave, a peace unlike any I’ve ever known flooded the room, washing over me.

    “Sarah, I’ve already saved you. I’ve already saved you.”

    “Can’t you see that?”

    “Don’t you understand that you are going to get healing whether on this side of eternity or the next?”

    “But right now, I need you to get it together because I’m not done with you yet.”

    Well, friends.

    I’m still here, and I haven’t picked up that knife again.

    However, having had that experience, I feel an obligation to share my thoughts on suicidality in the hopes that someone out there who is either struggling with this or knows someone who is might come away feeling encouraged.

    Or, at the very least, feeling like they’re not alone.

    I have a hypothesis, see.

    I can’t prove it empirically, but experientially, it held true for me.

    It is as follows:

    Regret and meaninglessness can knock you into suicidality, but loneliness ensures you won’t get up again. The only way to come out the other end is by receiving enduring encouragement.

    Let’s begin.

    Punch One: Regret

    Despite the fact that I had not (and still have not) received an official diagnosis for the veritable smorgasbord of things going wrong with my body, I know that I’m at least partly to blame.

    Because in 2014 and in 2015, I went on two courses of a drug called Accutane.

    Friends, all I can say is this: if you know anyone on this medication, tell them to get off of it.

    It isn’t worth it.

    Sadly, I didn’t learn until it was too late that the original drug had been pulled from the market after multiple lawsuits were filed on behalf of patients who had suddenly presented with chronic health conditions, meaning that I, in essence, had sacrificed my health, both physical and mental, for the sake of vanity.

    Friends, hindsight truly is 20-20, and having had this experience, I can confidently say there are few things more pitiable than a person whose ruin you can look to and say, “And yet they have done it themselves.”

    But that’s me.

    Truly, my situation–my sickness–is, at least in part, my fault.

    However back in September, when I was getting sicker and sicker, I was in no way ready to swallow that pill, and the realization that I’d had a hand in my sickness felt like a sledgehammer straight to the chest.

    Welcome, regret.

    It’s an incredibly powerful emotion.

    In fact, I’d contend it’s one of the most powerful and enduring negative emotions a human being can ever experience because even after making peace with whatever caused it, you can still feel it.

    It lingers like a bitter aftertaste, and when it’s fresh in your mouth?

    Forget about it.

    Punch Two: Meaninglessness

    On top of the regret I was wrestling with, my symptoms were, in fact, getting worse.

    The problems I already had were intensifying, and new issues seem to be cropping up left, right, and center.

    I couldn’t catch my breath.

    Almost daily, my legs were giving out on me on my way to class, numbness forcing me to either sit down or collapse.

    This resulted in a fair amount of scrapes, but my skin wasn’t healing. Any wounds or cuts I got would bleed for days and were recurrently cracking and peeling.

    On top of that, eating pretty much anything was making me violently ill. The sight of food absolutely sickened me and the thought of putting anything in my mouth was enough to make me cry.

    Reading and writing, things that I loved to do, hurt. My eyes burned with the effort, and for a time, they stung so badly I couldn’t even bear to go outside.

    But most challenging of all was the fact that even though all I wanted was rest, for a period of over three weeks, I was unable to sleep for more than two hours a night.

    Maybe less.

    I felt like I was losing my mind.

    Like I was living a half-life.

    Or better yet, a living death.

    I couldn’t imagine forty, fifty, sixty years like that, and even attempting to do so was enough to send me spiraling into a panic attack.

    I was barely making it through the day.

    “What’s the point?” I asked.

    “What could I possibly have to offer anyone the way that I am?”

    I had no answer.

    I couldn’t see anything but sickness.

    I couldn’t feel anything but sickness.

    I couldn’t be anything but sickness.

    I had a meaningless life, so why keep it?

    Lights Out: Loneliness

    So to sum things up, regret and meaningless had pretty well knocked me to the precipice of suicidality.

    However, even though their combined force was more than enough to choke me, it was the crushing and overwhelming sense of loneliness that ultimately broke me.

    I never used to understand what people meant when they talked about feeling alone in a crowded room.

    But boy oh boy do I get it now.

    On a college campus in a city filled with ambitious, type-A personalities, I felt like an invalid.

    A non-person.

    Everywhere I looked there were healthy, able-bodied people my age gamely planning and chasing their futures.

    I could not relate.

    I was barely making it through the day.

    I felt so alone.

    And with no official diagnosis, no visible symptoms, or clear prognosis, I felt like I couldn’t even share that I was in pain.

    What could I say?

    Nothing.

    And even if I could somehow articulate just how much I was struggling, who would really understand?

    No one.

    I was alone.

    All… alone.

    And adding loneliness to my already potent cocktail of sickness, regret, and meaningless, did nothing for my life outlook.

    I just couldn’t cope.

    So instead, I locked myself in my head, and drew the curtains closed, not planning on ever opening them again.

    Which brings me back to the knife.

    But I’ve already told you how that went, and if it wasn’t clear before, the fact that I’m here writing this should make it pretty self-evident that I’m not dead.

    So what helped me come out the other end?

    Lights On Again: Encouragement

    “I’m not done with you yet.”

    That was what God said to me that day in September of 2019.

    It was a pretty succinct message, but I’ll be honest.

    I didn’t believe it.

    No matter what I’d heard Him say, I felt like I was just dead weight, dragging everyone down with me.

    I couldn’t imagine God using me for anything, and I vividly remember grabbing a dear friend’s hand after confessing that I’d been struggling with thoughts of suicide and saying,

    “How can anyone look at me and see anything but a burden?”

    And do you know what she did?

    She reminded me of the story of the paralytic man.

    Specifically, she reminded me of the man’s friends who hauled him onto the roof, tore a hole through the ceiling, and lowered him down to Jesus, desperate to see him healed, and then she said,

    “Don’t take away our opportunity to love you like that.”

    “I can’t imagine what you’re going through right now, but, Sarah, you’re a blessing to us–not a burden.”

    I cannot tell you how much I needed to hear that.

    Because she wasn’t denying the situation.

    She wasn’t denying that my being sick put more demands on our relationship.

    But she saw it as a kind of sanctification, and hearing her say that changed everything.

    It was like a switch flipped.

    Because while I might not have had the desire to stick around for my sake, I could stick around for that.

    For the slimmest possibility that she was right and maybe God was using me and my infirmity to draw people closer to Him.

    With one sentence–one word of encouragement–she gave me purpose.

    She turned my lights on again, and they haven’t gone out since.

    What an incredible gift.

    I have no intention of squandering it.

    So friends, my aim in writing this is really to stress that your words matter.

    They matter more than you could ever possibly know.

    So when an opportunity arises to speak a kind or encouraging word to someone, be they friend or foe, take it.

    Don’t hold back.

    Because you never know if you might be the one to turn someone’s lights on again.

    P.S. I don’t know what you might be going through, but I want to leave you with this as my postscript. It’s a poem and a prayer that has brought me back from the brink of despair many times over the last two years.

    I hope it may serve as an encouragement to you.

    “I asked for strength that I might achieve

    I was made weak that I might learn to humbly obey

    I asked for health that I might do greater things

    I was given sickness that I might do better things

    I asked for money that I might be happy

    I was given poverty that I might be wise

    I asked for power that I might have the praise of men

    I was given weakness that I might feel the need of God

    I asked for all things that I might enjoy life

    I was given life that I might enjoy all things

    I got nothing that I had asked for but everything that I had hoped for

    Almost despite myself my unspoken prayers were unanswered

    I am, among all men, most richly blessed.”

    – Unknown Confederate Soldier

    A Noxious Noise

    Whenever I walk by someone smoking a cigarette, I do one of two things:

    I either 1) hold my breath or 2) cough like someone just gave me the Heimlich.

    Say what you want, but public shaming can be a very effective deterrent, and when it comes to lighting up, I am more than happy to be this woman:

    Seriously.

    Smoking is disgusting and does nothing for the surrounding air quality, so when climate activists finally come for the Marlboros, I will be Greta Thunberg-ing with the rest of them.

    And if you thought heads rolled when they came for straws, just wait until they get to vapes.

    But I digress.

    While I could talk about the degradation of air quality until the cows come home (although, I hear cows might be somewhat controversial, so they could be the next to go), the noxious gas that I want to talk about today does not come from cigarettes or cow buttocks but from the mouths of men and women.

    Gossip.

    Yes, I said it.

    People spew gossip left, right, and center without a thought or care, calling it “venting” or “bonding” or any other euphemism for what they’re really doing which is polluting the air.

    And just like cigarette fumes it doesn’t just stay there.

    People breathe it in.

    Some may even say that’s the point.

    Now, I’ve struggled with gossip for a very long time, so I get it.

    Really, I do.

    It feels good.

    It’s easy.

    It distracts from the crap going on in your own life.

    What’s not to like, right?

    Lots.

    Seriously, I could go on and on, but today I want to highlight the fact that while yes, things like cigarettes, vapes, and pollution writ large are clearly slowly killing us, gossip is an equivalent harbinger of death if not to us then to our relationships.

    Why?

    Cirrhotic Hearts

    In middle school, I got the whole kit and kaboodle of talks on drugs and alcohol, and while I’m sure it wasn’t all scare tactics, those are the only bits I remember.

    Sorry, but I challenge you to look at pictures of long-time heroine addicts and/or the rotten hamburger meat looking livers that come with alcohol abuse alongside boring facts and figures and see what you remember.

    Long story short, what we put into our bodies matters.

    And just as drugs and alcohol can and do bring disease and decay to all number of our body parts, gossip does the same to our hearts.

    Think about it.

    When was the last time you walked away from hearing gossip a better person?

    A better friend?

    Seriously.

    I’ll wait.

    Gossip doesn’t work that way.

    All it does is inject judgement and self-righteousness into our blood until eventually what we’re left with is this:

    A cirrhotic heart incapable of creating or sustaining a healthy relationship.

    And why is this?

    Well, because gossip isn’t just something we consume.

    It’s something we produce.

    Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks, and when your heart looks like decaying hamburger meat, what do you think you’re going to speak?

    Nothing good–that’s what.

    Meaning that creating and sustaining a happy, healthy relationship is going to be nigh on impossible.

    Communication in relationships is, after all, essential.

    So with a cirrhotic heart, you’re pretty much screwed.

    However, it’s not all bad news.

    Because just as a cirrhotic liver can regenerate and be made new, so too can a gossip-hardened heart.

    Here’s What To Do:

    First, recognize this is a war on two fronts.

    Given that gossip is a problem of both production and consumption, it’s going to require a pretty robust plan of attack if you’re going to beat it back.

    But it can be done!

    All it takes is two simple steps.

    Step 1: Cut Production.

    Between the consumption and the production of gossip, the latter is far and away the easier of the two to address given that if worse comes to worse, you can stuff a sock in your mouth and just keep quiet.

    After all, the old adage holds true:

    “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.”

    But let’s be honest.

    “Nice” is too vague a word to really inform or shape what we say or do.

    Instead, I propose a catch-all principle and two questions that you can use.

    Catch-all principle: It is better to talk to a person than about a person.

    This is by far the best rule of thumb for combating the production of gossip since communicating your thoughts and opinions about a person to that person is a conversation–not a gratuitous gossip fest being put on without them present.

    And while it might be an awkward or super uncomfortable chat, I guarantee it is better than the alternative.

    However, say you really, really want to talk about someone without them there.

    I submit there are two questions you first need to ask and honestly answer.

    Question 1: Would the person I’m talking about be encouraged by this conversation?

    This is basically another way of saying “if you have nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all,” but I think it does a better job of capturing the essence of what makes gossip so harmful, which is the fact that tearing people down or broadcasting the lesser angels of their nature without giving them a chance to defend themselves is really what poisons the well of relationships.

    However, saying a kind word about a person without them present is obviously something quite different.

    And let me be clear, if you want to tell your friends, family, and pretty much anybody else that you love Cultiv8ing Character, you don’t have to have me there.

    *insert shameless plug to subscribe and share*

    Question 2: Can the person I’m talking to positively affect the situation and bring reconciliation or, at the very least, resolution?

    One of the easiest ways to fall into gossiping is by “venting” to or “asking for an opinion” from someone who has absolutely nothing to do with the situation.

    You may want to talk to a friend, family member, roommate, classmate, coworker, random acquaintance, etc., but before you do that, you need to be honest about whether that person can actually be a part of the solution.

    If not, they have no business knowing, and you have no real reason to tell them.

    Ergo, keep it to yourself or talk to someone else who can actually help.

    But now comes the trickier bit because while you might be ready and willing to cut your production of noxious gossip fumes, getting everyone else around you to quit is a much taller order.

    RIP The Paris Agreement.

    However, whether your friends, family, etc. sign on or not, gossip still hurts you.

    So what to do…?

    Step 2: Refuse To Consume.

    Remember my modus operandi when I pass someone smoking on the street?

    If not, I’ll say it again.

    Either hold your breath or cough a la the Heimlich.

    When it comes to not consuming gossip, I think these are both wonderfully applicable practices.

    In principle.

    Let me explain.

    Option 1: “Hold Your Breath

    Now, obviously, I don’t mean this literally.

    You holding your breath until someone else stops gossiping will probably only result in you becoming unconscious due to a lack of oxygen.

    HOWEVER!

    The principle behind the practice is simple:

    Do not let any fumes in.

    And when it comes to not consuming gossip, there are two ways to do this:

    You can either plug your ears or make like a banana and split when someone else starts to gossip.

    I recommend the latter.

    It’s significantly less obnoxious.

    Option 2: “Cough a la The Heimlich”

    This option is not for the faint of heart.

    Because, in essence, what you are doing is calling attention to the fact that something not good is happening–be it smoking or gossiping.

    However, while smoking is pretty much universally recognized as a no-no–I mean, good grief! The packaging has a skull and crossbones on it–gossiping is not so taboo.

    As such, outright shaming people for partaking will probably do more harm than good.

    HOWEVER!

    There are diplomatic ways to communicate that you don’t agree with gossiping.

    Case in point:

    My freshmen year of high school, myself and three other friends were talking in my dorm room when one of the girls suddenly stood up and said,

    “Guys, I think we’re gossiping right now, and I really don’t feel comfortable participating in this. I think I need to leave.”

    She left, and we all stared after her in stunned silence.

    In effect, she’d both coughed and held her breath, and to this day, I still remember the feeling of embarrassment that remained in the room.

    It was incredibly powerful.

    Friends, I’m of the opinion that if you can change the room, you can change the world, so please consider reducing your gossiping footprint.

    You never know how much your one, seemingly insignificant commitment to do or say something different might impact those around you.

    I promise it does and will make a difference.

    And for those of you who disagree,

    If you think you and your commitment are too small to make a difference,

    You’ve clearly never slept in a room with a mosquito.

    P.S. I really am trying to build my readership here, so if you can subscribe and share, I would really, really appreciate it!

    Toilet Paper Advice

    I’m not sure if this is a Georgetown thing or what, but every month, they put up “Stall Seats” in the bathrooms.

    These signs hold the secrets to life.

    I kid. I kid.

    At best, they tell you about the cheapest places to eat in D.C. which, to be fair, is a pretty impressive feat.

    However, from time to time they try to give advice—frequently saying things that have me rolling my eyes.

    But in February, I was this close to ripping the poster off the stall wall and Nancy Pelosi-ing it right down the middle.

    I didn’t.

    We say no to vandalism here on Cultiv8ing Character, but golly gosh was I tempted because printed on that sheet was some of the worst relationship advice I’d ever seen.

    Still, I managed to abstain and allowed it to hang unbothered in every bathroom I encountered throughout the month of February.

    But it’s March now.

    The day of “Stall Seat” reckoning has arrived.

    So what was it that had me so bothered on this seemingly innocuous sign?

    Really just one line:

    And to be fair, I was on board until the word “validates,” so lest you think I’m against shared power and respect, think again.

    However, I am 100% opposed to the notion that a “healthy” relationship requires the validation of the other person’s “identities, feelings, and opinions.”

    In fact, I would make a case that healthy relationships demand the exact opposite.

    And I speak from personal experience.

    See, the whole reason I started Cultiv8ing Character was that I was previously a pretty awful human being until a series of come-to-Jesus moments at the start of 2019.

    I genuinely cringe thinking about who I was back then, and yet, had you asked me what I thought of myself, you would’ve gotten a pretty positive response on my end since I was well on my way to achieving my goal of becoming the Asian female version of Ben Shapiro.

    That was my idealized state.

    My final form.

    And in order to achieve it, I basically hooked myself up to an IV of political commentary that encouraged me to make other people look, sound, and feel stupid.

    That was fine by me.

    I felt completely justified in tearing them down.

    Publicly.

    Privately.

    Online.

    In person.

    It didn’t matter to me.

    I didn’t care.

    After all, if they couldn’t substantiate their arguments, they deserved to be rhetorically stripped, and if they couldn’t handle the heat, they didn’t belong in the kitchen.

    Really, I was doing them a service.

    Besides, “facts don’t care about your feelings,” and neither did I.

    The haters were gonna hate, and I was ready to kick butt, take name, and make bank.

    Friends, if it isn’t already painfully obvious, let me make this very clear:

    The absolute last thing I needed was validation.

    What I needed was a swift kick in the assumptions.

    And luckily for me, I got it.

    But that’s a story for another time.

    Today, I want to focus on why “validation” is not the foundation of a healthy relationship.

    Let’s begin.

    First, A Definition:

    Validate (verb): to make something officially acceptable or approved, especially after examining it.

    You might already be able to see the problems with slapping a “healthy relationship” sticker on the carte blanche application of this to someone else’s “identities, feelings, and opinions.”

    But if not, here’s my argument

    Identities, Feelings, And Opinions Are ALL Subjective.

    I might’ve called myself the Asian female Ben Shapiro.

    I might’ve felt that I was justified in tearing people down.

    I might’ve opined prodigiously about politics like I knew what I was talking about.

    *cough.

    No. Nope. And definitely not.

    I was so far off the mark it is not even funny.

    Identity. Wrong.

    Feelings. Wrong.

    Opinions. Wrong.

    I was not in tune with reality, but when I was strapped up to that IV of acerbity and epicaricacy, I couldn’t see past my subjectivity, and in my personal relationships, I all but demanded my family and friends validate me.

    Why?

    Because I, like so many others in our current culture, had fallen prey to the idea that love equals validation.

    It doesn’t.

    Sometimes Love Says, “No.”

    In this day and age, there is a borderline phobic attitude towards certain kinds of confrontation.

    I am currently a college student.

    Believe you me, I get it.

    However, that doesn’t change the fact that if you care about another human being, there is going to come a day (probably many) when you disagree.

    Because human beings are flawed and we like to do stupid things.

    Case in point:

    This video was making the rounds at Georgetown last month.

    If you can’t see it clearly, what’s happening is a boy jumping off the roof of an apartment building in a bid to Superman to the other side.

    He doesn’t make it.

    He could’ve died.

    He didn’t–thank God–but if he had…

    Do you think his loved ones would’ve been happy to have a video of it?

    Or do you think they would’ve rather his “friends” had put the freaking phone down and stopped him?

    Sometimes love says no.

    That is an extreme example to be sure, but there are plenty of things that we may do, think, say, or believe that don’t ultimately lead to our flourishing and may even lead to our ruin.

    And if someone loves you, they won’t be recording your descent, chanting,

    “YOU DO YOU!”

    “YES YES YES!”

    “GO GO GO!”

    They’ll be doing everything they can to make you see sense and crying out as loud as they can,

    “No–don’t!”

    To Agree, Or Not To Agree, That Is The Question.

    Now, I don’t want to be misunderstood as saying that healthy relationships require constant conflict, nitpicking, and invalidation.

    That is not what I’m saying.

    What I am saying is that blanket validation is not the way to go.

    Agree on what you can agree on.

    Validate what you can validate.

    But understand that a healthy relationship is not dependent on you chanting “yes” at the other person like some sort of spineless, insipid sycophant.

    Seek and practice discernment.

    Know when to say, “no.”

    And remember what Albus Dumbledore said,

    “It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to your enemies.”

    “But a great deal more to stand up to your friends.”

    What to Do with Darwinism?

    In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the historic rivalry between science and religion flared anew with the publication of Charles Darwin’s On The Origin of Species. With evolution and natural selection as its explanatory instruments, Darwin’s work was seen as a shot across the pulpit by conservative theologians who thought his theory had crowded out the Creator. Princeton Theological Seminary Principal Charles Hodge was one such theologian, and in 1874, Hodge pulled no punches in his trenchant rebuttal What is Darwinism?, writing, “The conclusion of the whole matter is that the denial of design in nature is virtually the denial of God… What is Darwinism? It is atheism.” For Hodge, there were multiple issues at play: the contradictions between evolution and Scripture, the distance and virtual “non-existence” of Darwinism’s deity, and Darwin’s denial of “final causes” which together convinced Hodge that Darwinism and Christian Theism were mutually exclusive and impelled him to call the former to account. Twelve years later, his son, Archibald Alexander Hodge, took a narrower view, penning an introduction to Theism and Evolution wherein he argued that as long as evolution stayed in its lane and left talk of “origins, causes, and final ends” to theologians, the two could coexist without issue. However, like his father, A.A. Hodge maintained that should evolution the theory ever become evolution the philosophy, it would be rightly called atheistic. Thus, ultimately, both Hodges were united in their rejection of Darwinism, seeing it as an overreaching worldview which contradicted both reason and revelation. 

    In this paper, I will focus mainly on evaluating and analyzing Charles Hodge’s three main critiques of Darwinism and argue that while he was ultimately right to categorize Darwinism as atheism, his rejection of evolution was a reactionary over-correction. In this respect, I will favor his son’s more measured response to science and scientific discovery. However, I will conclude with a critique of A.A. Hodge’s failure to apprehend and address the moral threat posed by a Darwinian worldview, something which, I believe, has done significant and lasting damage to society. 

    In What is Darwinism?, Charles Hodge identifies what he calls the “three distinct elements” of Darwinism: evolution, natural selection, and the denial of “final causes.” In Hodge’s view, they are ordered from least to most objectionable with Darwin’s rejection of teleology being absolutely and unequivocally untenable in his eyes. For the sake of this paper’s flow, I will evaluate his objections in reverse, beginning with his resolute insistence on “final causes” and concluding with his allegiance to Scriptural authority. 

    Darwinism’s denial of design is far and away the greatest sticking point for Charles Hodge due to the fact that it directly undermines any need for a Creator. However, despite being the most problematic of Darwinism’s tenants, it is also the one that Hodge most readily dispatches through an appeal to man’s reason, writing, “That design implies an intelligent designer is a self-evident truth. Every man believes it; and no man can practically disbelieve it.” While this is a highly logical argument, it relies on people being both rational and consistent, which, even in that day an age, was hardly guaranteed. However, of the rebuttals Hodge offers, this is easily the strongest.

    His intermediary critique of Darwinism has to do with the idea of natural selection. This element of Darwinism, while not necessarily atheistic, was deeply contrary to the Christian conception of God as an involved and active deity because it held that rather than changes in species being a manifestation of God’s guidance and will, they were merely physical processes brought on by the survival of the fittest. In essence, natural selection held that while God might have created life, He was no longer actively involved. This was the view held by Darwin himself, but according to Hodge, “An absent God who does nothing is, to us, no God.” Thus, this critique of Darwinism is more a Christian critique than a theistic one. 

    Finally, I want to evaluate Hodge’s response to Darwin’s doctrine of evolution. This is easily his weakest argument, something that, to Hodge’s credit, he acknowledges, writing, “It is conceded that a man may be an evolutionist and yet not be an atheist and may admit of design in nature. But we cannot see how the theory of evolution can be reconciled with the declarations of the Scriptures.” Now, while we now know that evolution cannot account for all of life’s complexity (see God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? and The Devil’s Delusion), at the time of his writing, Hodge’s reluctance to accept evolution was based on little more than feeling which is somewhat ironic given his earlier appeal to man’s rationality. Beyond this, treating the Bible as a scientific textbook when it is rife with poetic and symbolic language seems like a poor application of hermeneutics, and it lends credence to the idea that the Bible must be taken literally in order for it to be taken seriously. Furthermore, in implicitly advancing the idea that science could somehow subsume God, Hodge gives the impression that the God of the Bible is really a God of the gaps that will eventually be explained away by scientific progress. For all of these reasons, I much prefer A.A. Hodge’s attitude towards science and scientific progress, and I will now entertain a brief discussion of the strength of his argument in Theism and Evolution.

    In the introduction of Theism and Evolution, A.A. Hodge is careful to delineate between evolution confined within science and evolution loosed as a philosophy, writing, “Now when strictly confined to the legitimate limits of pure science, that is, to the scientific account of phenomena and their laws of co-existence and of succession, this doctrine of evolution is not antagonistic to our faith as neither theists or christians. It is only when this theory assumes to be philosophy, or becomes associated with a philosophy supplying the ideas, the causes, and the final ends which give a rational account of the facts collected, that it can challenge our interest as christians, or threaten our faith.” With the former, he takes no issue. With the latter, he echoes his father’s assessment that evolution very quickly lends itself to atheism. However, unlike his father, A.A. Hodge goes on to write that Christians need not fear scientific progress. In fact, they should welcome it, writing, “True science leads only to the truth, and all truth is congruous with true religion. We should hearty bid science Godspeed. Since our religion is true, matured science can only confirm and illume it.

    Now, I much prefer A.A. Hodge’s attitude to his father’s. I think setting up Christianity and science as combatants rather than complements is wrongheaded. If Christianity is true, we have nothing to fear from what science might reveal. In fact, being fearful of scientific discovery simply smacks of unbelief. However, where Charles Hodge was too timorious with respect to evolution, I think A.A. Hodge was a bit too effusive in his endorsement of scientific advancement. 

    While I fully agree that Christians have nothing to fear from what science can reveal, I think we have much to fear from what science can accomplish when partnered with a materialistic worldview. Even Richard Dawkins, who claims On the Origin of Species as his own personal Bible, acknowledges the dangers of living out Darwinism, saying in 2005 that “No self respecting person would want to live in a society that operates according to Darwinian laws. I am a passionate Darwinist, when it involves explaining the development of life. However, I am a passionate anti-Darwinist when it involves the kind of society in which we want to live. A Darwinian State would be a Fascist state.” More broadly, unmoored from objective morality, the capacity we have to seriously, even fatally, injure ourselves, one another, and our environment thanks to scientific advancement is both staggering and frightening. As Aldous Huxley wrote in Ends and Means, “We are living now, not in the delicious intoxication induced by the early successes of modern science, but rather in the grisly morning after where it has become apparent that what triumph science has done hitherto is improved the means for achieving unimproved and actually deteriorated ends.” 

    Now, I fully realize that A.A. Hodge could not possibly comprehend what something like the atomic bomb or eugenics would mean for humanity, but I still feel that he should have perhaps paid a bit more attention to addressing what the practical consequences of evolution as a philosophy would mean for society.

    Religion in America. Fall 2019. Grade Earned: A

    A “Higher” Love ft. Kygo

    So… if you, like me, are single as a pringle, you might’ve missed that last Friday was Valentine’s day (i.e. my least favorite holiday). However! It’s not all bad because, now, not only is all the luridly pink and heart shaped candy 50% off but I also feel 100% justified in sounding off on a love-related rant.

    You can blame Whitney Houston’s estate plan because the person in charge of it allowed for her rendition of “Higher Love” to be remixed into this:

    Now, I don’t actually recommend you watch the video because 98% of it is little more than soft-core pornography (And, friend, I know what I’m talking about there. If you want proof, you can watch my porn addiction testimony here).

    However, I’ve included it for the sake of providing ready evidence for verifying the following claim:

    Ladies and gentlemen, I submit that whatever the title of the song is, this music video isn’t about love.

    It’s about sex.

    Yes, I said it.

    Honestly, the first time I saw this travesty, I couldn’t help but think that I was undergoing some sort of Orwellian double-think conditioning to the tune of “Let’s show them a line up of half-naked, gyrating girls being leched on by random guys and superimpose the whole thing with the words ‘Bring me a higher love/ Where’s that higher love I keep thinking of?'”

    Because everyone knows that love–the highest love–consists of semi-clothed girls gyrating under the watchful eyes of strange men.

    UGHGHGISOGONSDNODO!

    I swear I could smack my face against my keyboard.

    What’s worse is that according to the published “like” count, OVER HALF A MILLION people agree that love basically equals sex, and close to SEVENTY MILLION have passively consumed this Orwellian message.

    Can we just… unplug the internet?

    Please?

    *Sigh.

    But I digress.

    The reason I wanted to talk about this is that I’ve been doing a bit of reading lately, and I’ve come across some interesting tidbits that give me something more to say about Kygo’s bastardizing–I mean–remixing of love other than simply

    UGHGHGISOGONSDNODO!

    With that being said, I’m going to try to inject a logical framework into my argument, so, keeping in mind that according to Kygo, Love = Sex, let’s crack in.

    I want to begin with a quote from Margaret Atwood’s now infamous novel The Handmaid’s Tale wherein she writes, “God is love, they once said, but we reversed that…”

    Let that sink in.

    “God is love, they once said, but we reversed that.”

    Love, then, is God, according to Atwood.

    But let’s not forget that according to Kygo, love is sex!

    So which is it?

    Well, who says they’re mutually exclusive?

    In fact, if we apply the Law of Syllogism to Kygo and Atwood, we’re left with this:

    Love is Sex ->

    Love is God ->

    Sex is God.

    In the modern epoch, is it not?

    Think about it.

    Has sex not become central in our society?

    Aren’t questions, concerns, and click-bait about sexuality in the news almost daily?

    Hasn’t “Netflix and Chill” subsumed dating?

    Heck, many esteemed colleges (*cough Harvard) now host “Sex-Weeks” during orientation as if we’re not already bombarded with enough sex-laden content to make Caligula blush.

    And this is all because singleness, or rather sexlessness, is basically now synonymous with death.

    Seriously.

    I recently told a friend that there’s probably no sex in Heaven and their response was, “Well, then I don’t want to go!”

    Clearly, for many people, sex has become their ultimate concern.

    But should it be?

    Is sex the “higher love” we should be thinking of?

    I say no.

    Why?

    Three main reasons:

    # 1 Sex Is A Depreciating Asset.

    I don’t know about you, but I’ve met precisely zero 80-year-olds who are in any condition to be swinging from the chandeliers.

    At that age, I’m pretty sure sex of any sort is just asking for a heart attack, so no matter how all-consuming it may seem right now, there’s going to come a day when sex won’t even be part of the equation in a romantic relationship anyhow. Thus, making it an element of ultimate importance seems, to put it bluntly, stupid.

    Not to mention unscientific.

    Because even amongst young people, the mind-blitzing passion that comes with sex quickly fades no matter your age. All you have to do is wait. And according to current research, from the initial point of entry, you are just two years out from passion’s latest biochemical expiration date.

    So, like I said, sex is a depreciating asset.

    If it wants to be deemed a “higher love,” it’s heading in the wrong direction.

    #2 Sex Is Bound To The Lowest Rungs Of The Ladder of Love.

    I recently read Plato’s Symposium wherein a number of ancient Greek figures, most notably Socrates, give speeches praising and characterizing love. Some are interesting while others are straight-up weird, but of all the speeches, the best known is actually Socrates’ reiteration of Diotima’s scala amoris or “ladder of love.”

    Now, while I don’t agree with everything in Socrates’ speech, I do think that the ladder of love provides a helpful framework for considering whether sex is a “higher love.”

    In essence, Socrates contends that there is a inherent hierarchy to the things we love, and guess what?

    Beautiful bodies are on the bottom.

    Why?

    Well, to put simply, it takes very little to appreciate a beautiful body.

    There is no moral formation or intellectual rigor required, and if you don’t believe me, feel free to ask a class of high school boys for their take on the matter.

    I think you’ll find them able to “appreciate” at the drop of a hat because when it comes to beautiful bodies, the chief method of appreciation is sex.

    Conversely, the other objects of love on the ladder (souls, laws, institutions, knowledge, and Beauty itself) simply cannot be boned. Their form precludes that kind of appreciation, making sex exclusive to the basest levels of love’s ladder.

    Does that make sex bad?

    No!

    But does it make sense to elevate it as that “higher love” we’ve been thinking of?

    Eh…

    I don’t think so.

    #3 Sex Is A Means–Not An End.

    This might be a hot take, but from what I can tell, people do not have sex for sex’s sake.

    Think about it.

    There is always something on the other end of sex be it reproduction, pleasure, intimacy, power, money, employment, a promotion, revenge, distraction, etc.

    Sex itself is not the end goal.

    It’s a means for achieving a myriad of ends, and therefore, it cannot logically be ultimate.

    However, even if you could somehow successfully argue that people have sex for sex’s sake, devoid of babies, pleasure, profit, etc., I would still say that sex as an end comes up relatively, if not absolutely, short.

    In Kant’s Foundations on The Metaphysics of Morals, he writes, “In the realm of ends everything has either a price or a dignity. Whatever has a price can be replaced by something else as its equivalent; on the other hand, whatever is above all price, and therefore admits of no equivalent, has a dignity.”

    Two words: Porn & Prostitution.

    Clearly, sex has a price and is not, inherently, dignified, so even if it were an end in and of itself, it would be a lesser–not a higher–one.

    So…

    In sum, we have a three-fold rebuttal to the claim that sex is a “higher love” on the basis that it is:

    1. A depreciating asset.
    2. Bound to the lowest rungs of the ladder of love.
    3. A means–not an end.

    Where does all this leave Mr. Kygo?

    Sorry, sir, but sex is not the higher love you’ve been thinking of.

    Q. E. Freaking D.

    P.S. If you want to get email updates when I post, make sure you’re subscribed! I promise not to spam you 🙂

    “You Can Be Free”

    This week’s post is a little (a lot) different.

    Brace thyself.

    So…

    Last night, I participated in an open-mic night at Busboys & Poets.

    For people outside of D.C., it’s a really neat restaurant/bookstore that’s known for its open mics and spoken word poetry competitions.

    Anyways!

    I was blessed to be able to share my addiction deliverance testimony there last night thanks to the wonderful host Charity Blackwell who not only allowed me to go over the allocated 5-minutes but also made me the spontaneous “Spotlight” as well.

    Guys.

    God is so good.

    So without further ado, below is the video of me sharing “You Can Be Free,” and if you take nothing else away, please know…

    There is hope.

    There is healing.

    There is freedom from addiction.

    And to the boy who came up to me, if you ever read this, you will never know how profoundly grateful I am that you came up to me afterwards and told me that what I said resonated with you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

    And to anyone else who has addiction as a part of your story, this one was for you.