Follow me:

    Stomping Out Apathy

    Last week, my pastor preached a sermon on Malachi 1-2, and in case you thought the Bible was boring, just know there is a verse in which God threatens to smear someone’s face with poop.

    Who knew?

    Anyways!

    The message was on our need to confront spiritual apathy, and boy was it convicting.

    Not only as a Christian but also as a person because lately, my default response to a lot of things has been varying shades of stone faced.

    Which is strange.

    Because by all accounts, 2020 has been rife with things that should have me sticking my foot through a wall with rage or, at the very least, feeling some sort of way.

    And yet…

    I’ve found myself pretty apathetic most days.

    In fact, the only thing that has recently managed to get a significant emotional response from me is the fact that my house is currently under the dominion of the world’s most obnoxious and nocturnal cricket.

    That is, until I kill it.

    The rule in our house has always been bugs live outside.

    They trespass.

    They die.

    But I digress.

    We’re not here to talk about crickets.

    We’re here to talk about being apathetic.

    Specifically, how to stop it.

    Because the point my pastor drove home last week is that apathy is not only a bad thing.

    Its an evil thing.

    And upon reflection, I completely agree.

    So this week, we’re going to talk about what are, I think, the three major causes of apathy:

    1. Safety
    2. Selfishness
    3. Impotence

    In the hopes that by addressing all three, we can more successfully stomp out apathy.

    Apathy Cause #1: Safety

    I recently finished reading Regarding the Pain of Others by the late Susan Sontag, and one line in particular really stuck out to me:

    “Wherever people feel safe–they will feel indifferent.”

    Yes and amen!

    I can’t be the only one who’s experienced this.

    I mean, this year has given pretty much everybody ample opportunity to see just how apathetic–even blasé–many people can be when they aren’t directly affected by something that others are experiencing.

    I know for me personally the two big heart-checks with respect to this were my initial response to the pandemic as well as the George Floyd protests.

    In both instances, I was pretty disinterested.

    At least to begin with.

    After all, neither of those issues were affecting me personally.

    No one I knew had COVID, and while I was sad about what happened to George Floyd, it wasn’t like I knew him.

    As such, I felt pretty insulated.

    Secure.

    Unaffected.

    Safe inside a hermetically sealed bubble.

    And then two things happened.

    My aunt and uncle got COVID, and some of my dearest friends started talking about how George Floyd’s death had affected them.

    And very, very quickly indeed I realized I couldn’t maintain my apathy.

    Because my family and friends were hurting.

    People I loved were in pain.

    And because of that, I couldn’t look away.

    I’ve been thinking a lot about how that works recently, and I came to the simple conclusion that being “safe” isn’t actually a solitary thing because when it comes to people I love…

    What hurts them hurts me.

    What hurts them hurts me.

    Therefore, as long as I love somebody other than just me, myself, and I, apathy cannot be a part of my life since even if I am 100% safe and secure at a given time, odds are good that that will not be simultaneously true of everyone I love’s lives.

    Because, frankly, my hermetically sealed bubble has a lot of people inside.

    So…

    If you, like me, have recently been shrouded in apathy, now might be a good time to drop a line and see if everyone you love is doing alright.

    And if you’re like,

    “Psh–all I really care about is me, myself, and I.”

    Read on!

    Because apathy cause #2 has a hold on your life.

    Apathy Cause #2: Selfishness

    I recently re-read Twelve Years A Slave by Solomon Northup, and holy cow should that be a required read.

    Seriously.

    There is so much truth about the human condition in that book that it’s honestly kind of mind-boggling.

    However, when it comes to the relationship between selfishness and apathy, there was one thing Northup said that really struck me.

    Writing about his sadistic master Edwin Epps, Northup noted,

    “Supreme selfishness always overmastered affection… He loved as well as baser natures can, but a mean heart and soul were in that man.”

    If you recall our discussion about safety above, it was my love–my affection–for my family and friends that impelled me to quit being apathetic.

    And yet…

    Affection may not be enough to overcome apathy if selfishness is present.

    We all know this.

    After all, it’s one thing to feel for another human being–it’s another to act accordingly, and if everything is about me, me, me…

    Well.

    While selfishness doesn’t preclude sympathy, it does a really good job of inhibiting altruistic activity.

    In her autobiography, 19th century philanthropist Annie Besant said as much, writing,

    “Plenty of people wish well to any good cause, but very few care to exert themselves to help it, and fewer still will risk anything in its support. ‘Someone ought to do it, but why should I?’ is the ever re-echoed phrase of weak-kneed amiability, but ‘Someone ought to do it, so why not I?’ is the cry of some earnest servant of man, eagerly forward springing to face some perilous duty. Between these two sentences lie whole centuries of moral evolution.”

    Now, I’m a bit (a lot) more optimistic than Besant.

    I don’t think it takes centuries to get from “why should I?” to “why not I?”

    In fact, I think it can take seconds.

    Because all you need to do is grasp the simple fact that you are not here to make a living.

    You’re here to make a difference.

    That’s what one of my all-time favorite pastors often says, and I could not agree more with him.

    “We’re not here to make a living. We’re here to make a difference.”

    Amen.

    Amen. Amen. Amen.

    So you see, if you are asking “why should I?,” you are actually failing at life.

    Because your weak-kneed amiability–your practical apathy–is a big ole neon sign that you are failing to do what you were created to do.

    You are failing to be what you were created to be, and the One who created you does not take that lightly.

    In fact, if the threat to high-five your face with poop is any indicator, I’d say it makes Him pretty angry.

    But lest you now think that the best thing for you to do is attempt to be as zealously selfless as you can be for fear of being dung-slapped by the Trinity, we need to talk about the third major cause of apathy.

    Apathy Cause #3: Impotence

    I will never forget the moment I re-watched the movie Pink Panther as an adult and realized that Steve Martin’s “miracle pill for the middle-aged man” was not–as my mom had told me as a child–headache medicine.

    Nopity. Nopity. Nopity. Nope.

    T’was a pill to help him get an erection.

    Because, you see, his mind was willing, but his body was weak.

    Now…

    What does that have to do with apathy?

    Well, from what I can see, a major cause of apathy is, ironically, the desire to do something.

    Revisiting Regarding the Pain of Others again, Sontag says the same, writing,

    “Compassion is an unstable emotion. It needs to be translated into action, or it withers… If one feels there is nothing ‘we’ can do and nothing ‘they’ can do either, one starts to get bored, cynical, apathetic.

    You see, when it comes to apathy, it’s not always a lack of desire that’s the problem.

    It’s a lack of ability.

    Put simply, if the mind is willing, but the body is weak, things can get (as many middle-aged men will no doubt attest) frustrating.

    Frustration is an extremely unpleasant emotion, and if it becomes too all encompassing, most people elect to simply feel nothing.

    Which is, in brief, how impotence begets apathy, and sadly, nowadays impotence is all over the place.

    In his iconic work Amusing Ourselves to Death, the late Neil Postman said this:

    “We have here a great loop of impotence: the news elicits from you a variety of opinions about which you can do nothing except to offer them as more news, about which you can do nothing.”

    Talk about frustrating.

    Add in the fact that we now exist in a world where news and information are, to use the 16th century meaning, ejaculated 24/7, and it’s no wonder that people have become so apathetic.

    So what can be done about it?

    First thing:

    Turn off the TV and step away from your phone and computer screens.

    I’m not even kidding.

    Because when it comes to stomping out impotence-driven apathy, closing the gap between desire and ability is key, and modern technology exacerbates that gap by showing us everything.

    Every evil, injustice, and social ill is readily displayed for all to see, share, like, and retweet, blowing out our desire to do something without proportionally increasing our ability to actually do anything.

    And hear me.

    Seeing injustice, suffering, etc. and wanting it to stop no matter where, how, or when it’s taking place is not and never will be a bad thing.

    But when what you’re seeing is something “about which you can do nothing,” it quickly becomes frustrating, and conscience raising quickly gives way to conscience fading because even though we may wish to be the all powerful One who never grows weary or weak and never needs to slumber or sleep, that isn’t you and it isn’t me.

    So…

    Instead of being glued to a screen rife with things about which you can likely do nothing, I suggest you get out in your community and do something.

    Volunteer.

    Start a petition.

    Give someone in need something to eat.

    Donate to Goodwill or The Salvation Army.

    Do a hundred–a thousand–other things that are already within your reach because, frankly, how can you hope to have a heart that beats across the country–even the world–if yours doesn’t beat across the street?

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    What Is Love?

    If any one of you are my friends on Goodreads, you’ve probably noticed that my reading tastes are, shall we say, varied?

    From children’s books about 12-year-old deaf girls who write songs for whales to ancient Greek plays, British nihilist manifestos, and abolitionist biographies, I’m kind of all over the place.

    However!

    A few weeks ago, I dipped my toe into a category I’d never read before and devoured two romantic comedies.

    I take my hat off to Jasmine Guillory and Samantha Young because their books were just what I needed.

    They were funny, refreshing, had happy endings, and reminded me that reading doesn’t always have to be serious or staid.

    Reading for fun is totally okay!

    Not to mention that while both books were very lighthearted and fluffy compared to a lot of what I read, they still gave me something to think about over the last few weeks.

    Because both stories embraced the belief that love changes everything.

    Now, don’t get me wrong–I completely agree!

    However, having now spent a lot of time reflecting over the last few weeks, I’ve come to the conclusion that love is misunderstood pretty regularly.

    See, to my musings, there are not one–not two–but three! kinds of “love” that frequently appear on the scene.

    They are, in brief:

    1. Crazy Love
    2. Dutiful Love
    3. Delighted Love

    And out of the three, only one is truly love (at least if you ask me).

    So today, I’m hoping to flesh out all three in the hope that you might be able to see the distinctions and consider which kind of love is the one you want to give and receive.

    Because, friends.

    You best believe that love changes everything.

    #1 Crazy Love

    Has it ever struck you as weird that the word love is often associated with the word crazy?

    Personally, the pairing has always seemed a bit strange to me.

    So recently, out of curiosity, I looked up crazy’s etymology and found that it comes from a late 16th-century word which means “to be full of cracks.”

    Now, that made the crazy-love pairing make a lot more sense.

    Think about it.

    I mean, I can’t be the only one who’s ever heard or seen someone profess, hand to chest, something along the lines of…

    “I need you.”

    “You complete me.”

    “I can’t live without you.”

    I don’t watch a lot of movies or TV, but I’ve seen enough to know that sentiment is expressed pretty regularly, especially in couple scenes.

    As such, we’re meant to take such statements romantically.

    However…

    I would submit that when people start saying those sorts of things, they have dipped into crazy love territory.

    Because if being crazy means being “full of cracks,” being “crazy in love” means you are looking for someone else to fill in all your gaps.

    “I need you… You complete me… I can’t live without you…”

    I have a big problem with that.

    Why?

    Two things.

    The first is the in practice fact that you will never find someone who can fill in all your cracks.

    There has only ever been one perfect human being, and He is unavailable for romantic coupling.

    So no matter how great the partner you find might be, they are themselves a flawed and cracked human being.

    As such, putting the onus on them to make you complete will set you on a fast track towards misery because your need to be complete is one they simply cannot meet.

    My second objection is in principle, and it is this:

    Crazy love is incredibly selfish.

    I need you… You complete meI can’t live without you…”

    We have all known people who NEED to be in a relationship.

    To them, being single may as well be a death sentence.

    I submit it’s because their cracks have become so vast that they feel impelled to latch onto whomever crosses their path.

    It’s actually quite sad.

    But it is also selfish–there’s no getting around that.

    Because in their efforts to be complete, the “crazy in love” are using people to meet their needs, and in doing so, they’re objectifying human beings.

    I’ve written on why objectification is bad before, so I won’t go into that today.

    Suffice to say it’s not okay.

    So in summary, crazy love is deficient because it is both practically impossible and intrinsically selfish.

    That’s not what love is.

    At least if you ask me…

    So let’s continue to option #2: The Big D.

    Duty.

    #2 Dutiful Love

    I was recently re-reading Kant’s Foundations of The Metaphysics of Morals, and something in there really stuck out to me.

    Kant writes,

    “To be kind where one can is duty, and there are, moreover, many persons so sympathetically constituted that without any motive of vanity or selfishness they find an inner satisfaction in spreading joy and rejoice in the contentment of others which they have made possible.

    “But I say that, however dutiful and amiable it may be, that kind of action has no true moral worth. It is on a level with [actions arising from] other inclinations which deserve praise and encouragement but not esteem. For the maxim lacks the moral import of an action done not from inclination but from duty.”

    I completely disagree.

    Sorry, Kantians, but this is where you lose me.

    See, what Kant is saying is that what gives something moral significance and/or esteem is when you do not want to do a thing but do it anyways out of “duty.”

    I don’t find that at all compelling.

    Not generally and certainly not when it comes to characterizing love as it should be.

    Why?

    Well, simply put, that kind of thinking turns love into misery.

    Because dutiful love is driven–not by affection–but by obligation.

    It pledges itself to a principle–not a person.

    It says,

    “I made a commitment to you, so I’ve got to stay even though I want to go.”

    That’s dutiful.

    It’s also awful.

    Truly.

    Ask anyone if that’s the kind of love they want to receive, and I can pretty much guarantee they’re going to say “no” immediately.

    No one I know wants to be an obligation.

    It’s gutting to feel like you’re something to be suffered or put up with in any relationship.

    And while the “dutiful” lover might be called honorable for staying when they want to flee, the love they’re offering is not what it should be.

    It’s perfunctory.

    Cold.

    Stingy.

    Not to mention that there’s a very good chance they are also in misery.

    So you see…

    Dutiful love is a two-way miserable street.

    It makes one party an obligation and the other resentful and long-suffering.

    That’s not at all what love is supposed to be.

    At least if you ask me.

    So…

    At this point, I feel I’ve painted a pretty grim picture of what love can be, and for that, you can blame the romantic comedies 🙂

    However!

    I also know what love can and should be, and for that, I direct you to option #3.

    #3 Delighted Love

    A little over a year ago, I heard a talk by Michael Ramsden wherein he said,

    “It is the nature of love to delight yourself in the other.”

    It lifted the roof off of my head.

    Truly, I can count on my hands the number of times I’ve had such a visceral reaction to something I’ve heard or read.

    Yes, I thought.

    Yes.

    That makes total sense.

    That is absolutely correct.

    And yet, even as I thought, “yes,” there was a sinking feeling in my chest.

    Because I knew I’d rarely, if ever, loved like that.

    The two types of loves detailed above were much more me.

    Selfish. Greedy. Needy.

    A function of filial piety.

    I loved for me or else because of who someone was to me.

    And it was empty.

    So very, very empty.

    But you see…

    I’ve now had a year of seeing love quite differently.

    And friends, let me tell you.

    It has changed everything.

    Because love that delights in the other is unlike any other.

    …at least if you ask me.

    How?

    Well, firstly and importantly, it requires that you be complete.

    You simply cannot be “full of cracks” crazy and truly delight in another human being.

    Your cracks will be too distracting.

    But once you’re no longer preoccupied with your need to be complete, you can truly delight in somebody.

    Because now you’re not loving from a place of need–you’re not loving because you have cracks that need filling–you’re loving because you have been made complete.

    Now, you are no longer loving for completion but from completion.

    Crazy love loves for.

    Delighted love loves from.

    Not for, but from.

    That is delighted love.

    It’s more interested in what it can give than what it can receive, and it gives and gives abundantly.

    And see that what makes it distinct–not only from crazy love but also from love as duty.

    Dutiful love does the bare minimum.

    It stays when it wants to go, but it isn’t joyful.

    It doesn’t overflow.

    It says, “I made a commitment to you, so I’ve got to stay even though I want to go.”

    It is, as we have already discussed, awful.

    Delighted love is incredible.

    It goes above and beyond.

    It sees love as an opportunity–not an obligation.

    Delighted love says, “There’s nothing I would rather do–there’s no place I’d rather be–there’s no one I’d rather see than you.”

    It says, “I’m so glad I get to be with you.

    And that’s the kicker.

    Dutiful love says, “I’ve got to.”

    Delighted love says, “I get to.”

    Not “got to,” but “get to.”

    Not for, but from.

    That’s love.

    That is love.

    And…

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    P.S.

    I’m so sorry I’ve been absent the past two weeks. Work and health stuff have been taking turns walloping me.

    “Love is patient. Love is kind. It does not envy. It does not boast. It is not proud. It does not dishonor others. It is not self-seeking. It is not easily angered. It keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails.” 1 Corinthians 13:4-7

    Where Are Your Cracks At?

    If you don’t know this about me, one of my all-time favorite movies is Evan Almighty.

    Evan Almighty (2007) - IMDb

    It combines so many of my favorite things:

    Steve Carell.

    Morgan Freeman.

    Washington, D.C.

    Pg-13 appropriate hilarity.

    And The Bible!

    (obviously)

    Anyways, I re-watched it recently specifically because I wanted to refresh my memory of an alpaca spitting in a corrupt politician’s face.

    What can I say?

    We all have our fantasies.

    Point being, I did not expect to be made to think.

    And yet that’s exactly what happened.

    (I’m about to spoil the movie, fair warning)

    See, the crux of the plot is that a congressman cut corners to build a dam in order to develop nearby land, and as a result, it’s riddled with weaknesses.

    Thus, when the pressure of the water gets too great, the dam breaks, cracking open like rotten egg and flooding everything (hence why an ark was necessary).

    Watching that scene, I realized something which has kind of been a eureka moment for me:

    Pressure reveals where we’re weak.

    I’ll say that again.

    Pressure reveals where we’re weak.

    I don’t know about you, but lately, Queen’s “Under Pressure” has pretty much become my anthem during quarantine.

    And I’ll be honest…

    It’s led to some cracking.

    So today I’d like to share the three areas that are, I think, frequently revealed to be weak (they certainly were for me!), and then offer some tips on how to reinforce those areas so you don’t flood everything!

    1. Temperament

    I like to think of myself as a pretty easy going person, and by and large, I’d say I have a solid grasp on my emotions.

    However!

    Recently, both claims have been put under a fair bit of strain thanks to a whole mess of things not exactly going my way.

    As a result, cracks have started showing in both my words and on my face.

    Patience, in particular, has shown itself to be a point where my dam is apt to break.

    online shopping waiting GIF

    HOWEVER!

    One thing quarantine has been great for is podcast listening, and just last week, I stumbled on a podcast that’s helped me tremendously.

    Much thanks to former Navy Seal Jocko Willink and his co-host Echo Charles who offered succinct yet solid advice on what to do when an emotion is pressurizing your insides.

    “Identify it, and separate the feeling from behavior.”

    It’s so simple, but over the last week, this has worked really well for me!

    I suspect it’s because identifying the feeling depressurizes it immediately.

    When I have to stop and say,

    “I’m being impatient (hangry, frustrated, etc.) right now.”

    It takes agency out of the feeling and gives control back to me.

    Once that happens, the feeling (whatever it may be) tends to subside significantly.

    However!

    Even if it doesn’t, the latter half of the advice–separating the feeling from behavior–keeps cracks and floods at bay because while I might not be able to completely push impatience (hanger, frustration, etc.) away, I can do my level best to keep it from affecting my words and face.

    2. Self-discipline

    I don’t know about you, but self-discipline is very important to me.

    In fact, in high school, I seriously considered going to a service academy or participating in ROTC because I figured that no place was as disciplined as the military.

    Unfortunately, I realized very quickly that 1) I could never meet the physical requirements, 2) I loathe mud and getting dirty, and 3) I don’t like it when people scream at me.

    meets toe GIF

    In brief, the military was not going to be my scene.

    Nevertheless!

    I still hold myself to a pretty strict routine, pieces of which include getting up early, exercising/writing daily, and reading the Bible first thing in the morning.

    However…

    Pretty much all that went out the window last week.

    Between starting a new job, coordinating events for clubs, and my insomnia acting up, I felt like I’d gotten hit by a truck, and almost all of my regiment failed to hold up.

    One by one, my daily habits and activities were washed away, and by the end of the week, I was not okay.

    Frankly, I was a complete and utter hot mess.

    The AC going out in the house did not help with this, but the fact of the matter is, in the face of even modest pressure and stress, almost all my self-discipline vanished.

    It was a very rude awakening, and in the last week, I’ve done my best to get things back to how they should be.

    It hasn’t been easy, but what’s given me the reinforcement I need is recalling what Auschwitz survivor Dr, Viktor Frankl wrote in his book Man’s Search for Meaning:

    “He who has a why can bear almost any how.”

    Now, he was writing on how he survived the Holocaust, which is obviously much more significant than my self-discipline being shot.

    However, the same principle applies, and that is in the face of pressure and adversity of any kind, you need a why.

    For me, recovering and reinforcing my self-discipline has meant asking myself why the routine I cultivated matters to me.

    Why do I get up early?

    Why do I exercise and write daily?

    Why do I read the Bible first thing in the morning?

    Answering those questions has helped me see why my routine is essential rather than incidental to my well-being, and I’m confident that in the future, having those whys will keep my self-discipline from cracking!

    3. Relationships

    I’m incredibly fortunate to have a lot of love in my life.

    Honestly, my family and friends are one of a kind, and the relationships I have with them are things I prize and do my best to prioritize.

    However…

    When things went crazy last week, I pretty much stopped communicating with everybody.

    I quit calling and texting–forget facetiming–and for a over a week, it was radio silence from me.

    I now see that cracks in relationships form incredibly quickly.

    A day of no contact can become a week which becomes a month then a year, and before you know it, the entire relationship has disappeared.

    It’s such a scary thought because whether or not you pick up the phone, time and life keep marching on, and I think it’s 100% true that you never fully appreciate someone until they’re gone.

    Last week made that very clear to me, and I now see that I have a number of relationships that are cracked due to inactivity.

    However!

    Having realized that, I’ve made it my mission to address the relationships in my life that need some TLC ASAP.

    I actually wrote out a hit list of people that I haven’t spoken to recently, and I’m going to work my way through them starting this week because even just thinking about how much of their lives I’ve already missed irritates me.

    So, fair warning.

    Texts, calls, and facetimes are incoming.

    angry crazy ex-girlfriend GIF

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    People-Shaped Puppets

    I recently came to the troubling realization that people-shaped puppets are taking over the world.

    Hear me out.

    I submit that pretty much everyone you see either has a hand up their posterior or, at the very least, is sprouting strings.

    While they might look, act, and sound like human beings, they’ve become little more than hand puppets or wooden dolls on strings.

    This is a no good, very bad, thing.

    So today, I’d like to go over the two main kinds of puppetry we increasingly see before offering the only way I know to remove the hands and cut the strings.

    Touchy Feely Puppetry

    In the eighth grade, my class of roughly forty students was divided in half.

    The boys went to the gym, and the girls went to the Language Arts class.

    There, us ladies were shown a video on mammograms and given a mercifully brief introduction to what we could expect when it came time to get a pap smear.

    To be clear, there is every reason to fear.

    How an Annual Pap Smear Can Help Save Your Life: Asia Mohsin, MD ...

    Anyways!

    When we came together again, the boys were intent on demonstrating the manner in which they were told to routinely check themselves for testicular cancer and muttering darkly about something called a prostate exam.

    Come to find out it’s basically men’s pap smear equivalent!

    What can I say?

    God is a God of justice.

    Amen?

    Amen.

    In either case, all of us, girls and boys alike, were varying shades of horrified at the prospect of someone else’s hands rooting around our insides.

    And yet…

    And yet.

    So many of us today are enduring perpetual pap smears and prostate exams because we’ve become little more than muppets directed by touchy-feely hands.

    And when I say feely, I mean feely because, from what I can see, feelings are almost all that’s directing the way people-shaped muppets act, talk, and think.

    Dr. Feelings is in elbow-deep, and a growing demographic are increasingly beholden to his hand as evidenced by the fact that excuses like these are given again and again:

    “The heart wants what it wants.”

    “It feels so right.”

    “I just couldn’t help myself.”

    Color me unimpressed.

    Honestly, I when hear stuff like that, I have to stop myself from asking,

    “Do you like having a perpetual pap smear/prostate exam?”

    And more to the point…

    Is Dr. Feelings the one who should be in command?

    Some people say yes.

    During a 1948 debate on the existence of God, atheist philosopher Bertrand Russell Russell told his interlocutor, Father Frederick Copleston, that Dr. Feelings got to have his way with him.

    Frederick Copleston: “What’s your justification for distinguishing between good and bad, or how do you view the distinction between them?”

    Bertrand Russell: “I don’t have any justification any more than I have when I distinguish between blue and yellow. What is my justification for distinguishing between blue and yellow? I can see they are different.”

    Copleston: “Well, that is an excellent justification, I agree. You distinguish blue and yellow by seeing them, so you distinguish good and bad by what faculty?”

    Russell: “By my feelings.”

    One wonders what he would have said if asked,

    “Dr. Russell, in some cultures, they love their neighbors. In some cultures, they eat them. Both on the basis of their feelings. Do you have any particular preference?”

    It would have been interesting to hear what Russell said.

    Especially if he hadn’t eaten lunch yet.

    After all, Dr. Feelings is cannibalism’s fiercest advocate.

    Why shouldn’t hunger decide what is wrong and right?

    Cookie Monster is clearly living his best life.

    cookie monster eating GIF by Sesame Street

    And yet…

    I would submit that muppets do not make the best decisions.

    And maybe you agree!

    Maybe you’re like,

    “Pfft. Dr. Feelings doesn’t control me.”

    I commend you for being in the minority.

    However!

    That only covers puppetry from within, and there’s also a without parallel to being a muppet.

    It’s being a marionette.

    Stringy Puppetry

    As a child of the 2000s, I was raised under the “because I said so” model of parenting.

    “You don’t have to want to, you just have to do it” may as well have been tattoed across my dad’s forehead, and it was a line he used to great effect.

    By and large, I was obedient because

    1. I was afraid of getting punished and
    2. I was a kid. At the end of the day, I did what my parents said.

    Thus, as a child, I was basically a marionette, doing what I didn’t want to do because I was afraid and/or passive.

    Now, hear me.

    When it comes to kids, I don’t object to this.

    Nine times out of ten, kids should listen to their parents because otherwise we’d probably all be pre-diabetic or dead before the age of ten.

    HOWEVER!

    The problem I see is that adult marionettes are increasingly a thing.

    Can you imagine an adult sized marionette?

    The visual is horrifying.

    And historically, the results have been equally so.

    Obedience based on fear and passivity does not often take us where we want to go.

    In 1968 during the Vietnam War, an event occurred that is known as the My Lai Massacre.

    Over a period of roughly four hours, American soldiers murdered, raped, and mutilated over three hundred Vietnamese civilians–men, women, and children.

    Made to give testimony about what led up to and occurred during the event, the participating American soldiers echoed a common thread:

    Fear.

    Fear of the Vietnamese and fear of their commanding officers.

    The former incited the massacre.

    The latter sustained it.

    In both instances, fear of external actors, be they Vietnamese or their superiors, made the men akin to marionettes.

    They did what they were told to do, even as some of them broke down and wept.

    Another manner by which people can become marionettes was highlighted in Dr. Stanley Milgram’s infamous 1961 experiment where participants were instructed to deliver increasingly severe electric shocks to test subjects.

    The experiment was designed to test the power of authority versus the power of personal conscience when asked to harm another person, and obedience to authority unequivocally won the contest.

    Every participant, when prodded by the overseeing experimenter, shocked the test subject up to 300-volts, and over half of the participants went all the way up to 450-volts.

    In Dr. Milgram’s Obedience to Authority, he offered two explanations for the results of the experiment:

    1. A person who has neither ability nor expertise to make decisions, especially in a crisis, will leave decision making to the group and its hierarchy. The group is the person’s behavioral model.
    2. A person comes to view themselves as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and they therefore no longer see themselves as responsible for their actions.

    They become either a cog or an instrument, but in either case, both explanations rely on the person being a passive participant.

    A marionette.

    Which is all well and good until someone ends up dead.

    christmas wet bandits GIF by Home Alone

    At this point, I hope I’ve convinced that people-shaped puppets are bad, whether in the shape of muppets or in the shape of marionettes.

    I mean, for one thing, puppetry has not so great externalities.

    Cannibalism. Massacres. Electrocution.

    All not so great things.

    But most problematic (at least to me) is that fact that if you’re a puppet, you’re not actually free.

    You’re essentially a slave to feelings, fear, or passivity.

    I think slavery is a very bad thing, so to conclude this post I’d like to offer my thoughts on how to best remove the hand and cut the strings.

    Panning Puppetry.

    In John 8:31-32, Jesus says to Jews who had believed him, 

    “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

    Truth is an incredibly powerful thing.

    If feelings, fear, and passivity are rock, paper, and scissors, Truth is the dynamite that blows them all to smithereens.

    And yet…

    There are a lot of people that resist the Truth for self-imposed slavery.

    Artistically, this sad reality was expressed in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where in one memorable scene, John “The Savage” goes on a tirade, trying to liberate the soma-stupored from their self-induced slavery, crying,

    “But do you like being a slave? Do you like being babies? Yes, babies. Mewling and puking! Don’t you want to be free and men? Don’t you even understand what manhood and freedom are?”

    The scene concludes with John being taken away as the others scrabble for the happy-dappy pills he’d been trying to throw away.

    They don’t want to be free.

    They’d rather be drugged into stupefaction than reckon with what freedom might mean, and I suspect it’s because freedom in the true sense of the word is an incredibly demanding thing.

    When Jesus says,

    “The truth will set you free,” that freedom comes with responsibility, something that is anathematic to our modern, libertarian sensibilities.

    To most people today, especially in the West, freedom means autonomy (i.e. getting to do whatever we want without restraint).

    However, in reality, the truest, highest freedom is not simply freedom from but freedom for.

    Yes, Truth will remove Dr. Feelings’ hand and cut fear and passivity’s strings, but it will also demand self-control, bravery, and acts that are supererogatory.

    In recent history, I think Martin Luther King Jr. is a tremendous example of what it means to be liberated by Truth and truly set free.

    His commitment to non-violence, willingness to endure abuse and death threats, and persistence in the face of rabid segregationists and imprisonment are all hallmarks of a person who’s been liberated from the puppetry of feelings, fear, and passivity and has given themselves to being truly free.

    Would that that might be me.

    Would that that might be everybody.

    Because Lord knows I’ve had enough of people-shaped puppetry.

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    How To Be More Interesting

    “Sarah, you look so boring.”

    It was orientation week of my freshman year of high school, and I was sitting in the dining hall across from someone who would come to be one of my dearest friends, stunned and more than little insulted.

    “Uh…”

    I had no idea what to say to that, but my face must’ve said something because she rushed to take her words back.

    Come to find out that what she meant was that I looked bored, but as a non-native English speaker, things had gotten mixed in translation.

    And yet…

    Her words were pretty accurate.

    Because, friends, until quite recently, I was about as interesting as a potato sack.

    It took me much longer than I would have liked to come to that particular realization, but c’est la vie.

    At least now I’m much more interesting.

    I think.

    🙂

    Anyways!

    Today, I’d like to share three actionable steps I’ve taken to become a more interesting human being so as to engage the world without fear of being told…

    “Sarah, you look so boring.”

    Love you, Hailey Lee.

    The steps are:

    1. Reject Passivity.
    2. Find Your Niche.
    3. Get Good At Asking Questions.

    Let’s crack in!

    #1 Reject Passivity

    I shared this a while ago, but I recently finished writing a Young Adult novel!

    I started querying literary agents last week so #prayforme because the stats for getting an agent are… not the most encouraging.

    rejected rejection GIF by HULU

    Anyways!

    One big thing writing a novel taught me is that passivity is not interesting.

    Nobody wants to read about a bump on a log who does nothing.

    It’s boring.

    Unfortunately, given the ascendancy of technology (not to mention quarantine!) being a humanoid log-bump is now all too easy.

    I, for one, have spent hours in bed or at my desk, scrolling through Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram, and Facebook, and, as of this blog, I have now watched every single season of Amazon Prime’s sports docu-series “All or Nothing.”

    Friends, I do not even like sports.

    I am simply log-bumping, and log bumps are not interesting.

    So!

    Don’t be like me!

    Put down the phone.

    Turn off the TV.

    And then…

    #2 Find Your Niche

    While the first step towards becoming more interesting is getting off your butt and actually doing something, there are plenty of people who reject passivity and do things that are still not very interesting.

    I, for one, have started compulsively cleaning everything.

    stressed spongebob squarepants GIF

    Cleaning is not very interesting.

    I mean, thanks to COVID-19 and quarantine, cleaning is certainly not unique to me, and even if it was, it requires very little expertise.

    In brief, it is not particularly niche.

    Niche things are interesting.

    At least if you ask me.

    Because they are either inherently unique or they become so by dint of someone accumulating an extraordinary amount of expertise.

    In both instances, you have greater insight and authority on whatever your niche may be, distinguishing yourself from the average human being.

    That makes you more interesting.

    So!

    What is your niche?

    What are things that make you unique?

    In what areas do you have a notable amount of expertise?

    If you can’t answer these questions right now, no worries!

    Because even if you presently have no niche—even if you are the most generic human being—you can cultivate expertise in something.

    Anything, really.

    I once met a guy who could recite word-for-word the entire first season of The Office.

    He was an interesting guy.

    However, finding your niche (i.e. identifying what makes you unique and/or cultivating expertise) is not an overnight process.

    And in the meantime, you’re going to want to be at least somewhat interesting regardless.

    And to do that…

    #3 Get Good At Asking Questions

    When I first realized I was something of a bore, the first thing I did was focus on and talk about myself more.

    That was a bad idea.

    You know the saying,

    “Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt?”

    That applies here.

    “Better to be thought a bore than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

    In fact, while you’re working on finding your niche and distinguishing yourself, I submit that the best thing you can do is actually focus on someone else because, in my experience, it is a truth often forgotten that interesting people are interested in people.

    I wrote about this last week, but human beings are meant for connection.

    We thrive on mutually uplifting interactions.

    So if all you do is talk about yourself and expect others’ genuflection, you’re not going to be interesting.

    You’re going to be a butthead.

    Seriously.

    Even if you’re the most interesting person in the room, there will come a point where people are going to get sick of you if all you do is talk about you.

    Hence the importance of asking questions!

    Because not only do they take the focus off of you, but there’s a very good chance you might actually learn something new–not to mention you’ll be beefing up your expertise in how to do an interview!

    It’s a win-win-win for you!

    I highly recommend it.

    I mean, my very first blog post for “Cultiv8ing Character” was about the time I asked a stranger a very simple question and the ensuing conversation.

    But what kinds of questions should you be asking?

    Two good rules of thumb I’ve picked up are to 1) avoid “yes or no” questions and 2) to connect them.

    Instead of asking: “Did you have a good week?”

    Ask: “What was the best/worst part of your week?”

    Instead of asking a bunch of disjointed questions, ask questions that build off the answers you receive.

    The conversation will be more interesting, but more importantly, you’ll have formed a deeper connection with another human being!

    And at the end of the day, that’s the most important thing.

    Well, that’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    Objecting To Objectification

    Last week, I wrote about how I recently reassessed my priorities, and argued that, for me, a major key was differentiating between human beings and material things.

    HOWEVER!

    The more I thought about it the more I realized that in this day and age, the line between human beings and material things (i.e. people and objects) has become increasingly blurry.

    And frankly, it has me worried.

    Because a person is someone you connect with.

    An object is something you use, consume, and/or control.

    They are not interchangeable.

    At all.

    And yet!

    From what I can see, we are increasingly confusing people with objects and treating them–and even ourselves!–accordingly.

    This is a no good, very bad thing.

    Bad for you.

    Bad for me.

    Bad for everybody.

    So today, I want to talk about the three main ways objectification manifests in our society nowadays so that you can see them for what they are and run the heck away.

    #1 “Market Yourself!”

    I recently had the pleasure of writing a cover letter!

    Said absolutely no one ever.

    Seriously.

    I am convinced that if Dante could write a postscript to Inferno, he’d add cover letter writing to at least one of Hell’s circles.

    They are, quite possibly, the worst.

    Writing them physically hurts.

    And the advice I routinely see on how to write a great” cover letter does absolutely nothing to make them more appealing to me.

    “You have to sell yourself!” they say.

    “Know how to market yourself!” others proclaim.

    Oy vey.

    Friends, in Kant’s Foundations of The Metaphysics of Morals, he states,

    “In the realm of ends, everything has either a price or a dignity. Whatever has a price can be replaced with something else as its equivalent, but whatever is above all price and therefore admits of no equivalent, has a dignity.”

    Selling or marketing yourself seems, to me, to be very, very at odds with the notion of human dignity.

    You are not a thing.

    You are not meant to be marketed or sold.

    Human beings are priceless, and using language that strongly implies otherwise makes me extraordinarily uncomfortable.

    And listen, I get it.

    Most of the time when we’re hunched over our laptops, pounding out resumes and cover letters slightly desperately because we realize that soon we’ll be graduating with a liberal arts degree and the future is in robots and Elon Musk’s fever dreams and chanting “market yourself-market yourself-market yourself” inside our insomnia-addled brains…

    What we’re trying to do is communicate how useful we can be, but I’m afraid that all too often what we communicate is

    “Use me.”

    And again!

    You are not an object—a thing.

    You are a human being.

    You are not meant to be used.

    You’re meant to be connected with.

    The two are extraordinarily different.

    One extorts your gifts.

    The other uplifts.

    I mean, I know which one I’d pick.

    #2 “You’re A Snack!”

    It was the spring semester of my sophomore year, and I was sitting in my Culture & Politics class having just watched a presentation about how women are treated within and objectified by the fashion industry.

    There was a lot of skin on display, and I felt confident I knew the path the subsequent discussion would take.

    “Objectification is bad.”

    Which, I mean, while not the most in depth analysis, is one I wholeheartedly agree with, so I was game.

    HOWEVER!

    That is not what was said.

    Instead, one by one the objection was raised that the women being objectified all looked the same.

    Friends, I about fell out of my seat.

    Here we had just watched women be trussed up and spit out like slabs of meat, and the main issue for the class was that there wasn’t a greater variety?

    One of the girls in the class said something to the effect that it bothered her that women who looked like her were largely absent, and another concurred, saying,

    “You’re a snack!”

    Everyone laughed.

    But I wanted to scream.

    I wanted to scream at the top of my lungs,

    “YOU ARE NOT A ‘SNACK!’

    “You are so much more than that.”

    “Can’t you see?”

    “You are so much more than a piece of meat.”

    “Why would you even want to compete?”

    I just… I just don’t get it.

    The issue, to me, is not whether the ham is honey-baked, browned, or blanched… whether it’s the size of a house or the size of my hand…

    It’s that it’s a freaking ham.

    Friends, honest question:

    Are you ham?

    I am not a ham.

    I am a person, Sam, I am.

    And so too are you.

    And listen, I get it.

    I’ve written about vanity before, and I’ve struggled with comparing myself to store mannequins and billboards.

    But friends.

    I think we’ve spent so much time and energy worrying about whether we and the people we see are considered fit for consumption that we’ve forgotten that what we’re meant for is connection.

    So, again.

    You are not a snack.

    You are a person.

    Please, please don’t forget.

    #3 “You’re A Machine!”

    I got a new laptop recently, and it has everything…

    Touch screen.

    PC.

    Decent memory and battery.

    Minimal holes for water to get in and nuke the thing, which, if you read my post last week, you will know is very, very important to me.

    HOWEVER!

    I almost didn’t buy it.

    Why?

    Because midway through his pitch, the friendly Best Buy guy said,

    “And it has Alexa built in.”

    Full stop.

    Reverse course.

    Why he thought that was a selling point I do not know.

    All I can say is some people never saw The Disney Original Movie Smart House growing up and it shows.

    Friendly Best Buy guy must’ve seen the look on my face and sensed his sale slipping away because he quickly said,

    “She can be disabled. Easily.”

    Not it.

    She.

    Friends.

    We have humanized a machine–a thing–giving it a name, a British accent, and a personality.

    Personally, I find this creepy, but what really, seriously worries me is that while we are busy humanizing machines, I think we are simultaneously mechanizing human beings.

    What do I mean?

    Well, from what I can tell the things that make machines like Alexa valuable are 1) how easy they are to control and 2) how much added efficiency and/or productivity they bring to the table.

    Now, that’s all well and good in a machine (even if the CCP is totally listening).

    But that’s not what we should value in human beings.

    And yet!

    I regularly hear people say,

    “S/he’s a machine!” as if that’s a great, good thing.

    I’d argue it’s incredibly devaluing.

    Because what you’re lauding is someone’s ability to take commands.

    To be efficient.

    Productive.

    A machine can do that.

    I don’t see it as a compliment.

    And if you do…

    If you derive your value from your ability to execute commands and be efficient and productive…

    What you are sacrificing in order to accomplish that?

    If I had to guess, I’d say human connection is probably on that list because if you see yourself as a machine, you aren’t meant to be connected with.

    You’re meant to be controlled.

    So…

    Are you working yourself to the bone under the thumb of someone else’s demands and control?

    Or is it self-imposed?

    Do you see your efficiency and productivity as be all end alls?

    Are you striving to be a machine or are you content with being a human being?

    The former has definitely been me, but I can happily say that that’s no longer the case!

    I have taken myself out of the mechanization race, and I’m going at a human pace, making time for friends, family, and faith.

    So!

    Let’s rehash 🙂

    The three main ways objectification manifests today are:

    1. “Market Yourself!”
    2. “You’re A Snack!”
    3. “You’re A Machine!”

    Friend, you are not a thing.

    You are a human being.

    Priceless.

    Precious.

    Made in God’s Image.

    And the amazing thing is even if your cover letters stink…

    Even if you’re never considered fit for snacking…

    Even if your efficiency and productivity are lagging…

    Your humanity–your worth–will never change.

    You will always be worthy of connection, love, and affection.

    And that–that–is a great, good thing.

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    A Super Wet Reality Check

    The Sunday before last, I decided my laptop needed a bath and promptly dumped an entire bottle of water on top of it.

    It was drenched.

    Now, having soaked my phone a few years ago, I know that water and electronics do not mix.

    As such, I did my best to wipe it off, and within twenty minutes, my aunt had whisked me to the local uBreakiFix.

    Now, bearing in mind that I’d just gotten whacked with taxes and was not, eh-hem, in the best fiscal position to purchase a new laptop, I prayed for the best, but a few days later, I got the news…

    Not only was my laptop dead, it was inoperable and rigged to blow like some sort of kamikaze pilot.

    The technician told me, and I quote,

    “The battery is so swollen that if we tried to open it up, the whole thing could burst into flames or explode.”

    Message received.

    My laptop was officially deceased.

    But here’s the crazy thing.

    When I walked out of the uBreakiFix toting my soggy laptop, I was smiling.

    Why?

    Well, friends, I submit it had to happen.

    My laptop had to die.

    Because it was steadily taking over my life, commanding my energy, mind, and time and causing me to neglect things that matter more and most in life.

    Frankly, its loss felt like a liberation, and its absence gave me a chance to reflect on the things I had prioritized which led me to the discomforting realization that things we prioritize can actually be ciphers for the things we idolize.

    Let me explain.

    Nowadays, when people think of idols, there’s a good chance they still think of wooden carvings and golden calves.

    However, to my understanding, idolatry is simply and fundamentally a disordering—an elevation of an inferior thing over a superior thing—which is, I believe, something that actually happens pretty frequently.

    No wooden carvings or golden cows necessary.

    For example, in my life, my idols were the things I’d write.

    See, I’d been spending nearly sixteen hours a day either planning blog posts, working on the book I need to revise, or writing its sequel.

    Writing had basically become my life, and my laptop was the altar where I gave my sacrifice.

    So it had to go.

    It had to die.

    Because I needed to be free of it to really reassess my priorities in life.

    And, friends, to that end, I’m implementing what I’m calling a good, better, best check in order to keep myself honest.

    Because here’s the thing:

    We don’t typically prioritize bad things.

    That would be ridiculous.

    Instead, what we typically have are choices between good, better, and best.

    Idolatry comes when we put good above better and better above best and then God has to do something like send a flood and make your laptop get drenched.

    So!

    With all the being said, here is how I’m distinguishing between good, better, and best. 🙂

    Good: Material Things.

    One of my all time favorite movies is The Internship with Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson.

    It is hilarious and, from what I’ve heard, a fairly accurate representation of what working at Google is like, which, frankly, blows my mind.

    But there’s one scene in particular that I think is helpful in distinguishing between what is good and what is better, and it occurs when Owen Wilson says to Dylan O’Brien’s character (who is perpetually attached to his phone screen),

    “Great big world out there, my friend. Just three inches up.”

    Granted, at the time, they were at a strip club (which, if you know anything about my porn addiction testimony, you’ll understand that that’s not exactly something I’m a fan of).

    However!

    I relate to Dylan O’Brien in that scene because, pre-flood, I was glued to my computer screen.

    A material thing.

    A machine.

    While I’d like to think that my blog and the books I am writing are good, maybe even great, things, I was neglecting better things.

    Specifically, my friends and family.

    Better: Human Beings.

    In On The Free Will of Choice, Evodius observes,

    “Something that is alive is better than something that merely exists.”

    Amen!

    I knew this, but my life wasn’t reflecting it.

    My laptop–my writing–was governing my life, and while I might love to write and hope to maybe one day do it full-time, people, especially my family, rank much higher in my eyes.

    I’d lost sight of that, and it took the loss of my laptop to make me sit up and realize that I was prioritizing a thing to living, breathing human beings.

    That was stupid of me, and now, I’m striving to be much more conscious of how I treat and prioritize “things” (like writing and laptop screens) relative to the relationships I have with the people–the human beings–around me.

    However, my relationships with family and friends weren’t the only things I was starting to neglect because I wasn’t just putting good above better.

    I was putting good above best.

    Best: Eternal Life.

    Last week, after getting the news that my laptop was dead, I went shopping for a replacement.

    On my mind were things like touch-screen, PC, and erm… cheap, but two biggies were a long, long battery life and minimal ports (i.e. minimal opportunities for water to get inside). 🙂

    See it irritates me when electronics die, whether in the short term or for all time.

    I don’t think I’m alone in that.

    By and large, people want their gizmos and gadgets to last, which is why, when they die, people feel irritated… mad… even sad.

    But the fact remains that material things, like laptops, are things that we can—and do—lose.

    And sadly, the same can be said of human beings, too.

    Friends.

    People are not permanent.

    They can exit our lives and even life itself, and there’s little we can do.

    While human beings are certainly better than material things, they still lack permanency, and I’d submit that the best things in life are the things we cannot lose.

    According to the incomparable Augustine, there are two:

    “Now nobody is secure in goods that can be lost against his will. However,
    nobody loses truth and wisdom against his will. It is not possible for anyone to be physically separated from them.”

    As a Christian, I believe, as Augustine did, that Truth and Wisdom aren’t just abstract concepts, but a living, loving being that offers eternal security—everlasting life—to me and to you.

    In John 14:6, Jesus says,

    “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”

    Friends, I believe that wholeheartedly, but before my laptop got fried, I’d been neglecting the way, the truth, and the life, spending almost all my time attached to a screen, completely neglecting the One who has offered me eternity.

    No more.

    If my laptop had to get soaked for me to see that my priorities had gotten jacked, then I pray it gets hit with a hammer if I ever start to creep back.

    As it stands, I am recommitting to keeping good, better, and best in check, and at this point, I just have to laugh because seriously, friends, who knew a reality check could be so wet?

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    When Criticism Comes…

    Friends, my brain aches in the best of ways because for the last few weeks, I’ve been taking summer courses with the Hertog Foundation, and golly gosh have I been made to think. 

    It’s been a truly wonderful experience, and anyone interested in Great Books or political philosophy should definitely give them a look (it’s all expenses paid, so really, there’s no excuse)!

    Anyways, this last week, we were reading Sophocles’ Antigone, and one scene in particular really, really stuck out to me as a great case study in how to take critiques. 

    Or, rather, how not to take critiques because the critique-ee in question, King Creon, is a total donkey.

    Stubborn would be putting it mildly.

    At least initially.

    If you haven’t read the play, let me set the scene:

    King Creon, having sentenced his niece Antigone to die for violating his prohibition against burying her brother Polyneices, a traitor, in Creon’s eyes, is approached by three people who tell him he’s making a mistake, and by the time he listens to them, it’s too little, too late.

    Antigone dies, and Creon’s son and wife commit suicide.

    All because he wouldn’t swallow his pride.

    *Sigh.

    However, we can’t be too hard on Creon.

    After all, I think it’s a general fact of life that no one particularly likes being criticized.

    We are all, at least to some extent, “wise in our own eyes,” so when criticism comes, our first reaction is to pop off. 

    “Who are you to tell me x, y, and/or z?”

    “You think you’re better than me?” 

    “I bet you’re just trying to get something or manipulate me!” 

    I know I’ve certainly been guilty of thinking, even saying, those kinds of things when people have criticized me.

    But, friends.

    I speak from experience when I say that being prideful and poo-pooing or denouncing your critics as inferior and/or malicious hacks is a surefire way to ensure life bites you right in the–

    Personally, I’ve found that more often than not, if I’d taken people’s criticism seriously, I would have spared myself a lot of growing pains and more than a little heartache.

    Which is why, at the end of the play when Creon tells the audience,

    “I have learned in sorrow,”

    I’m like AMEN!

    Amen. Amen. Amen.

    But boy do I wish I didn’t relate to that.

    So friends, today I would like to share what has helped me, a prideful butthead by nature, really listen to and take critiques by analyzing King Creon’s failure to do just that in Antigone.

    In brief, when criticism comes, there are three big questions you should ask, and if one or more of them are answered affirmatively, you’ll really want to stop and think on what’s just been said instead of acting like a prideful butthead.

    They are as follows:

    1. Does My Critic Want Good For Me?
    2. Do They Speak From A Place Of Authority?
    3. Are They One Of Many?

    Let’s crack in!

    1. Does My Critic Want Good For Me?

    In Antigone, Creon’s first critic is none other than his son, Haemon, who early on tells him,

    “Father, your welfare is my greatest good.”

    That alone should have given Creon pause.

    Tellingly, it did not.

    That’s a problem.

    Because if he’s unwilling to listen to the critique of someone who has his best interests at heart, odds are good he’s just being stubborn.

    And frankly, if there’s one question of the three that’s the most important when it comes to taking critiques, “Does my critic want good for me” is the biggie.

    If you can answer “yes” to this question, I can pretty much guarantee you need to really listen to the given critique.

    For me, this means that when my friends, family, and/or people who are mentoring me let me know that they see something in me or my life that doesn’t seem right, I’m all ears.

    Because even though it might be hard, even excruciating, to hear, I know that at the end of the day, their heart is for me, and while we might ultimately disagree, their critique is a sign of love for me.

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again:

    Sometimes love says “no,” and you want people in your life who will lovingly tell you when you’re driving off the road.

    2. Do They Speak From A Place Of Authority?

    This might be the asian in me, but I’m a big believer in listening to your elders and appreciating experience and expertise.

    In my mind, “The Three E’s” connote authority, which means that when anyone in possession of any or all of the three critiques me, I’m at least listening since odds are good they know more than me.

    This is why when Creon’s second critic, a wizened and well-respected prophet called Teiresias, came on the scene, I was like,

    “Oh snap… you better listen to him. He’s got all three E’s.”

    But of course, Creon, being a donkey, does no such thing, accusing Teiresias of accepting bribes and other unscrupulous things.

    To which Teiresias replies,

    “Stubbornness and stupidity are twins.”

    Amen.

    Friends, when someone with any amalgamation of “The Three E’s” sees something in your life that they feel the need to criticize, it behooves you to at least consider their advice.

    3. Are They One Of Many? 

    The third and final question you want to ask has to do with the quantity of the people that are taking you to task.

    Because even if you don’t think they want good for you…

    Even if you think they’re a total dodo…

    If they’re the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, etc. person who’s seen fit to say something to you, you’re going to want to stop and ask if maybe they’re spitting facts.

    Now, I’ve written about how to deal with an onslaught of criticism in the past, so suffice to say that I don’t think a large quantity of critics necessarily means they’re correct.

    However, if different people at different times are all giving you the same advice, it’s worth a listen.

    A word of caution, though.

    If you’re at the point where multiple people, in isolation, have given you the same advice, you might be running out of time.

    That’s what happened to Creon.

    In his case, it was the Chorus Leader that finally broke the donkey’s back, convincing Creon to listen to the criticism both his son and Teiresias had already brought before him.

    Unfortunately, as has already been said, it was too little, too late by then.

    Antigone was already dead.

    Creon had hemmed and hawed for too long, ignoring loving, authoritative criticism, and he was made to pay the price, losing his son and his wife.

    Such is the consequence of being “wise in your own eyes.”

    All that to say…

    Friends, if you repair to the top of this page, you will see that “Cultiv8ing Character” is predicated on the belief that it is never too late to change.

    However, you have to want to change, and sometimes that means listening and really taking the criticism that comes your way.

    SO!

    The next time criticism comes, ask yourself…

    1. Does My Critic Want Good For Me?
    2. Do They Speak From A Place Of Authority?
    3. Are They One Of Many?

    And if the answer to one or more of these is yes, consider carefully whether that criticism might just be something you need to address.

    That’s all for this week!

    If you want to support me, please subscribe and share 🙂

    It costs nothing, but it’s just nice to know I have readers out there!

    Don’t Be A Hypocritamus

    I was recently listening to a talk by Michael Ramsden where he recounted a meeting with the British Foreign Minister who he quotes as having said,

    “Hypocrisy is the new global, unforgivable sin.”

    I’ve been thinking a lot about hypocrisy since then and getting a fuller picture of how profoundly damaging it is, and I wanted to write about it.

    So I am!

    But first, just to get the definition of hypocrisy out of the way:

    Failing to meet a standard you’re trying to meet is not hypocrisy.

    That’s just being a human being.

    However, claiming to value a standard publicly and/or privately while completely ignoring it personally…

    Now that’s hypocrisy.

    And it is a no good, very bad thing which is to be avoided by anyone with even a semblance of integrity.

    Hence why I wanted to address the issue of hypocrisy since you can’t really “cultivate character” while being a hypocrite.

    At least if you ask me.

    And hey, full disclaimer: I’m no stranger to hypocrisy!

    Old Sarah was a butt on many fronts, but I’m trying to get those days behind me 🙂

    Anyways!

    This week, I want to highlight telltale signs of when you might be dealing with a hypocrite or even *eh-hem* being a hypocrite.

    And to do this, I’m going to roast hippopotamuses.

    What can I say?

    It’s been a minute since I’ve used an animal to make an argument, okay?

    Bear with me 🙂

    Besides!

    From what I can tell, hypocrites and hippopotamuses actually have a lot–a lot–in common.

    So without further ado, here are three signs a hypocritamus is in the room!

    Sign #1: Throwing Their Weight Around

    Did you know that hippos are the third largest land mammal on planet earth?

    They average a whopping 3000 pounds so if one sits on you, you will almost certainly become one with the dirt.

    Given this, it stands to reason that hippos have a very healthy and uh, heavy, sense of self-worth.

    So too do their hypocritamus counterparts.

    Men and women who, while probably not 3000 pounds, are almost always large and in charge.

    Or, at the very least, they like to think they are.

    Because sadly, you don’t have to be a billionaire, a political leader, or a celebrity to claim to rule the waves only to wave the rules.

    You just have to have a hippo-sized ego.

    From there, it doesn’t take much to convince yourself that the rules don’t apply to you.

    After all, rules are meant for underlings.

    You are meant for higher things.

    You’re more intelligent, more righteous, more capable and benevolent than the other people in the room.

    At least, that’s the way I used to think, and from what I can tell, among hypocritamuses, that mode of thinking is not unique.

    They are all more (fill in the blank), and they’re not shy about throwing around that added weight.

    Thus, while they don’t think rules aren’t bad per se, they just don’t think they should have to obey.

    As we shall see when we get to #3, the former claim can and does change.

    But first, let’s discuss what happens when you call a hypocritamus out on their hypocritical ways.

    Sign #2: Lashing Out With “What About…?”

    Did you know that hippos are actually the world’s most dangerous land mammal?

    They are extraordinarily aggressive, killing roughly 500 people a year.

    So if you cross one, be prepared because if they see you as a threat, they are going to try to chomp you in half.

    Amazingly, hypocritamuses behave in much the same way.

    If you call them out on their hypocritical ways, they’re going to lash out and get in your face.

    We see this a lot nowadays.

    You point out someone’s ideological and/or lived inconsistency (AKA hypocrisy), and the first thing they say is

    “Well, what about x, y, and z?”

    Typically pointing to something they perceive to be a mark of your own hypocrisy.

    Now, it very well might be.

    In which case, take care to check that you are actually being consistent in what you preach, do, and think.

    After all, we’re trying to minimize–not multiply–hypocrisy.

    A sea of hypocritamuses is exactly what the world does not need.

    However, at least in my experiences, the “what about” lash out lacks any real teeth.

    It’s a deflection mechanism.

    An excuse.

    And if you–a person with integrity–press the hypocritamus on their inconsistency, you’ll get to see the depth (or lack thereof) of their dedication to what they supposedly believe.

    Sign #3: Sinking To The Bottom Of The River

    So you’ve pressed the hypocritamus on their hypocrisy, and they’ve lashed out with a “What about x, y, and z?”

    To which you, a person with integrity, have replied,

    “Yes, I agree. It is wrong to do x, y, and z.”

    Now, the hypocritamus is floundering.

    They were banking on you being hypocritical too, and without that, they don’t know what to do.

    Now, they either admit to being a hypocrite OR somehow slip the noose.

    Seeing as “hypocrisy is the new global, unforgivable sin,” which do you think they’ll choose?

    Option number two!

    But there are only two ways to quit being a hypocritamus.

    You either…

    A) Recommit to the standard you claimed to uphold.

    OR

    B) Abandon having any standards at all.

    Ergo you sink to the bottom of the river.

    Historically, option B is the more popular of the two.

    If you don’t believe me, I challenge you to think of any quote “double standard” that existed in the past where the higher standard is the one that is now existent.

    I’ll wait.

    It’s extremely rare.

    Now, I think there are a couple reasons why this happens, but the leading one, as far as I can see, is that people get tired of living hypocritically but also have no interest in adhering to a standard–that while good–they don’t actually, themselves, want to keep.

    Sinking to the bottom of river takes care of both of these, and sadly, I think bottom feeding is becoming our norm, even our general cultural trajectory.

    Reflection on it depresses me.

    Because what that means is that a carrying capacity of the population has ceased to believe that living with integrity is how you succeed.

    I think former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom Jonathan Sacks put it best when he said,

    “Too many people… have come to the conclusion that if you can get away with it, you would be a fool not to do it.”

    This makes me want to scream.

    Because if that’s true, we’re in big, big trouble.

    So I’m asking.

    Do we believe that living with integrity is not only a worthwhile thing but an essential part of what it means to be a human being?

    Do we believe it leads to our flourishing?

    Or are we intent on being hypocritamuses?

    Throwing our weight around, lashing out with “what abouts,” and sinking to the bottom of the river when we finally get called out?

    Just something to think about.

    thank u, next ft. Ariana Grande

    When I first heard Ariana Grande’s now iconic song “thank u, next,” I’m not going to lie…

    I liked it.

    I know-I know!

    That’s a rarity for me!

    Contemporary music is not usually (*cough ever) my cup of tea.

    But not only is “thank u, next” admittedly very catchy, it also contains the message that you don’t need to be in a relationship to be content.

    Can I get an “AMEN?”

    Now, I won’t get on my singleness soapbox here, but it’s safe to say, I’m a fan 🙂

    However…

    While I appreciate Ariana shouting out singleness, upon further reflection and closer inspection, I’ve become a “thank u, next” skeptic for one simple reason:

    There is a BIG difference between being single and being self-reliant, and “thank u, next” is, to my hearing, on the wrong side of it.

    Let me explain.

    What Does Ari Actually Say?

    The song opens with Ariana listing out her exes and paying homage to her past relationships.

    Alas, they were not meant to be.

    So she says “thank u… next” and continues in her next breath,

    “I met someone else
    We havin’ better discussions
    I know they say I move on too fast
    But this one gon’ last
    ‘Cause her name is Ari
    And I’m so good with that (So good with that)

    She taught me love (Love)
    She taught me patience (Patience)
    How she handles pain (Pain)
    That ***’s amazing (Yeah, she’s amazing)
    I’ve loved and I’ve lost (Yeah, yeah)
    But that’s not what I see (Yeah, yeah)
    ‘Cause look what I’ve found (Yeah, yeah)
    Ain’t no need for searching
    …”

    Interesting.

    So, in brief, Ariana is saying “yes!” to herself, and “thank u, next!” to everyone else.

    They’ve all let her down, and now she is her own lover, counselor, teacher, etc.

    Friends.

    That is more than singleness.

    That is self-reliance.

    Which, as distinct from singleness, is actually a no-good, very bad thing.

    Indeed, I’m going to make the case that self-reliance is perhaps one of the most dangerous, albeit popular, ideologies at play in the culture today.

    So…

    Sorry, Ari, but I’m going to have to say thanks but no thanks.

    Why?

    Well, because the consequences of self-reliance are, shall we say, not so great.

    Let me explain!

    Consequence of Self-Reliance #1: Ignorance

    Just this week, during a televised interview with her husband Will Smith, Jada Pinkett Smith proclaimed,

    “You can’t find happiness outside yourself.”

    In our present day and age, this seems to be a prevailing belief, and as a result, to many, including Ariana Grande, there “ain’t no need for searching…”

    Not for lovers. Not for counselors. Not for teachers.

    We are all we need, and self-reliance is seen as a great, good thing!

    This is a problem.

    Why?

    Well, because when you elect to be self-reliant, you pretty much have to think you’re the bee’s knees, totally and utterly complete with no need for anybody else to come on the scene.

    Unsurprisingly, when you think this way, you are going to be missing things.

    Because I don’t know about you, but I certainly don’t know everything.

    Frankly, what I know could fit in a thimble and still have room to roll around.

    Claiming otherwise seems, to me, like sheer lunacy–but don’t just take it from me!

    In Plato’s Symposium, Diotima tells Socrates,

    “What is especially difficult about being ignorant is that you are content with yourself, even though you’re neither beautiful and good nor intelligent. If you don’t think you need anything, of course you won’t want what you don’t think you need.”

    Preach.

    That’s a prophetic word for somebody.

    Truly, I wonder what Diotima would think about #noneedforsearching.

    I have a feeling she would be profoundly unimpressed because ignorance, to the ancients, would in no way be bliss.

    In fact, Socrates is recorded to have said,

    “There is but one evil, ignorance.”

    If it’s put into action, I’m inclined to agree with him.

    Which brings me to the second consequence of self-reliance.

    Consequence of Self-Reliance #2: Lawlessness

    When Ari says,

    “I met someone else. We havin’ better discussions” and that someone else is herself…

    We should be worried.

    Why?

    Well, in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay, aptly titled “Self-Reliance,” he writes,

    “On my saying, ‘What have I to do with the sacredness of traditions, if I live wholly from within?… if I am the devil’s child, I will live then from the devil.’ No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature.

    Recipe for disaster.

    I actually can’t think of much that would wreck the world faster than everybody cleaving to Emerson’s espoused philosophy and declaring,

    “I’ve discussed things with me, myself, and I, and I think x, y, z is right! Now, I will do what feels right to me!”

    Hello, anarchy.

    Truly, that’s the logical corollary of self-reliance.

    There are no rules but thy rules….

    Goodbye, civil society.

    But don’t just take it from me!

    In a 2018 interview, lawyer, author, and apologist Abdu Murray put it this way,

    “One of our country’s greatest concepts is freedom, but in today’s society we have confused freedom–the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without restraint–with autonomy–freedom from external control or influence. When you are autonomous, you are literally, by definition, ‘a law unto yourself.’ Well, what happens when you are a law unto yourself and I am a law unto myself and we disagree? Truth is no longer the arbiter between us so when we clash in the public square, it won’t be truth that decides; it will be power. And that ultimately leads to authoritarianism which is enslaving. Isn’t it ironic that autonomy–which we think is freeing–actually leads to slavery?”

    Touche.

    So anarchy then slavery.

    Fantastic.

    Yay self-reliance.

    But! You might say, That’s only if self-reliance runs amok and goes astray.

    If it just affects one individual, how bad can it be?

    Let’s see.

    Consequence of Self-Reliance #3: Meaninglessness

    In The Abolition of Man, C.S. Lewis writes,

    “An ethics based on instinct will give the innovator everything (s)he wants and nothing that (s)he does not want.”

    As we have just discussed, that kind of thinking goes nowhere good.

    However!

    When Ariana Grande says,

    “I know they say I move on too fast
    But this one gon’ last
    ‘Cause her name is Ari
    And I’m so good with that

    There’s a part of us that hopes she’s correct.

    We want her “new relationship” to last because if she’s already said “thank u, next” to everyone else, all she has left is herself.

    So if that doesn’t last, exactly what/who is her alternative?

    That’s a scary question because most would agree that if we can count on anyone in this world, it would be ourselves!

    Right?

    …right?

    Wrong.

    I think we can all admit that we’ve done stuff we’d rather forget.

    Stuff that if our partners did the same, we’d quit the relationship.

    I for one can say I’ve done things that make me feel (literally) sick to my stomach, and were it not for my faith, my family, and my friends, I’ll be honest…

    It would be really hard to forgive myself, move on, and truly live.

    So what happens when you come to the end of yourself and you’ve already said, “thank u, next” to everyone else?

    I’d argue it’s a downward spiral which ultimately ends in meaninglessness.

    An artistic proof of this would be none other than Shakespeare’s Macbeth who, having lost his men, his wife, and arguably his mind, has to face the reality that his decisions have created a situation where he very well might die.

    His response?

    Proclaim that there is no meaning to life:

    “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow creeps in this petty pace from day to day, to the last syllable of recorded time; and all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

    But is that true?

    Or is that the cry of someone who had so isolated himself, so relied upon himself, that when he reached the end of himself, he simply didn’t know what to do.

    For the self-reliant, errors take on a different character.

    There is no one to restore them

    No one to uplift them.

    No one to forgive them.

    And in that case, who would choose to live?

    Would you not prefer meaninglessness?

    Because if life doesn’t matter, those mistakes–those errors–don’t matter.

    There are no consequences because your life was of no consequence.

    Oh, friends…

    That’s the ultimate end of self-reliance.

    It’s nothing to sing about.

    It is sad.

    Very sad…

    But take heart because there is an alternative!

    Selective Reliance For The Win!

    At this point, I hope I’ve convinced you that self-reliance is not all it’s cracked up to be.

    Despite its popularity, it breeds ignorance, lawlessness, and meaninglessness, which, at least if you ask me, are no good, very bad things.

    Thus, instead of self-reliance, I would gently suggest selective reliance as superior modus operandi.

    Why?

    Well, if we rewind to the very beginning of “thank u, next” where Ari lists her exes, I think we’ll find that part of her problem is that she does not appear to have had the best taste in guys.

    Now, I don’t know them personally, but a bit of googling made it clear to me that entering into a committed relationship with them was not, perhaps, the best course of action.

    Don’t throw rotten tomatoes at me, but I firmly believe that giving your heart, mind, body, etc. to someone should be done with a fair bit of selectivity.

    And frankly, there are certain things that I think would lead to someone being disqualified quite quickly.

    If you ask me, when it comes to picking your person, you’ll want to ask some questions that speak to their reliability.

    My shortlist is as follows:

    Have they proven to be trustworthy?

    Do they want good for me?

    Do they make me a better human being?

    All that to say…

    If you’ve been burned in the past and find yourself in a place where you’ve got to say,

    “Thank u, next,”

    Just… consider carefully to whom it is that you are going to ultimately say,

    “Yes.”